Democracy and its Indian Constitution are frauds invented to enslave and steel possessions of one and rape any woman of one's choice. Our fate has been sealed with the compilation of the dreaded Indian Constitution. Neither Vedic culture nor Bharat nor human race would survive. While Article 29(1) has snatched liberty of worship and right of life, Article 39(c) has snatched our right to property since Nov 1949. The property right, provided to the citizens vides Article 31 of the Indian Constitution, which could not be snatched by Britons and constitution committee, was snatched by the dreaded parliament in collusion with judiciary of that Democracy, whose proceedings starts with the extortion of Rs. ten towards 'Bhent'. Article 31 pertaining to fundamental right to property has been omitted since 20-6-1979.
Government of Sonia, by Sonia and for Sonia
There is no Democracy in India. This is a Government of Sonia, by Sonia and for Sonia. Don't agree? Here you are:-
President Pratibha Patil is nominated by Sonia. Every Governor of State is nominated by Sonia. Every chief minister of congress majority states is nominated by Sonia. Now Sonia has nominated PM Manmohan too.
Governors are not elected by people of the State in which the Governors rule. Yet they can topple the Government elected by the people of the state.
While Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution grants unfettered fundamental right to Christians and Muslims to eradicate Vedic culture, there is no law to conserve Vedic culture.
The Indian Constitution has been compiled by the Britons' Congress Party in retaliation and to settle vendetta for opposing British rule amongst other reasons. The fraud and guide, supporter and protector of usurpers, assassins, and rapists Indian Constitution says,
IN OUR CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY this twenty-sixth day of November 1949, do HEREBY ADOPT, ENACT, AND GIVE TO OURSELVES THIS CONSTITUTION.
This is fraud. The people, who compiled the Constitution, were not elected by the people of Bharat after transfer of power by Jesus. No referendum or plebiscite was ever arranged to obtain the consent of the people about body of the Indian Constitution. Then how the people of Bharat enacted, adopted and given to themselves this guide of usurpers, murderers, rapists, secession mongers etc.?
Don't be in panic. Read on...
Islam and Christianity are fraud upon humanity and they must go. Socialism of Carl Marx has already gone to hell. Now is the turn of Christianity and Islam.
As per the dogmas of Islam, Non-Muslims are Dhimmis reduced under the status of chastened subservience. Ghost and bastard Jesus commands Christians to slay those who do not accept Jesus their ruler. (Bible, Luke 19:27). Our fate has been sealed since November 26, 1949. A situation one does not know. We are consigned in the jaws of two criminal cultures named Christianity and Islam through the Article. 29(1) of the very Indian Constitution. Don't believe? No problem. Here you are,
Human race is in jeopardy
We, Aryans, are non-believing people. Commander-in-Chief of army and President Pratibha, a puppet of Antonia has taken oath to defend the dreaded predator and pirate Indian Constitution. She has support of cow and man-eater thief Antonia Maino, another agent of Putanaa culture and Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution. So long as the Indian Constitution, Koran and Bible survives, human race cannot survive. Socialism of Carl Marx has already gone to hell. Now is the turn of Christianity and Islam.
No voter can change Articles 29(1) and 39(c) and no voter can claim restoration of Article 31 of the Indian Constitution. Thus, one votes to decide as to who would plunder one? Whether Atal or Mulayam or Rahul or Antonia Maino? One accepts through electoral process that every Muslim and Christian shall retain right to convert, rape women of alien faith, plunder and murder aliens. Still the Muslims and Christians would remain nationalist, merciful, and secular! Socialism of Carl Marx has already gone to hell. Now is the turn of Christianity and Islam.
While the Governors and President have taken oath to defend the very Indian Constitution, Judges of apex court have taken oath of faith of the very Indian Constitution. Governors are armed with Sections 196 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code to defend the killer Muslims and Christians and usurper public servants.
Even in Judiciary, as long as judges extort Bhent and money for bringing case in cause list in Allahabad High Court, it is not considered corruption. As long as Judges help usurpation of properties of haves, they are not considered corrupt. No sooner, the very judges do justice, they are branded as corrupt.
Public servants are deputed to insure that Aryans must get a warm feeling and a broad smile on their faces, when they are told that Allah plots against them and hates them. Every mention about the kafir and Satan is negative. "Kafir" and "Satan" is usually translated as unbeliever, but this is wrong. The word "unbeliever" is neutral. The Koran and Bible defines the kafir and Satan by its usage and says that the kafir and Satan can be killed, (Koran 2:191) and (Bible, Luke 19:27) roasted, (Koran 4:56) hated, (Koran, 9:28) punished, (Koran 33:61) raped, (Koran 23:6) (Bible, Isaiah 13:16), mocked, (Koran, 4:76) enslaved, (Koran 9:29) plotted against, Bible commands that Satan must be slain.--
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?
Split on Speaker, but experts slam Governor as one
Posted: Tue Oct 12 2010
While the Karnataka High Court will decide on whether Karnataka
Assembly Speaker K G Bopaiah was right in disqualifying 16 rebel MLAs
— 11 from the BJP and five Independents — ahead of the trust vote,
legal experts were divided on the constitutional validity of his act.
Surprisingly, the majority of experts, including a senior law officer
of the Government of India, said the Speaker's action was not wrong.
Almost all legal experts, however, came down heavily on Karnataka
Governor H R Bhardwaj for writing to the Speaker, directing him not to
disqualify the rebels before the trust vote.
"The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution deals with the issue of
anti-defection. Under the Constitution, the Speaker is the authority
to disqualify the member. His decision is, however, subject to
judicial review. On the question of when a MLA attracts
disqualification proceedings, the Supreme Court has held that it is
for the Speaker to take the view that a member of a party can be
proceeded against under anti-defection laws. It is not necessary for
the MLA to have parted company with the party, his actions can be the
basis of such an action," said former Lok Sabha secretary general and
constitutional expert Subhash C Kashyap.
Asked if the confidence vote could be treated has having been
completed merely on the basis of a voice vote in the Assembly, Kashyap
said there was no rule under the parliamentary procedure dealing
exclusively with a floor test.
"It is treated like any other motion. The Speaker can rule the motion
passed by voice vote. It is only if some members — even one member is
sufficient — challenge the decision of the Speaker, is the motion put
to division by automatic vote recorder or paper slips," Kashyap said.
On the question of the Governor's instructions to the Speaker, the
expert said the Governor had no authority to send the letter that he
did. "He (Bhardwaj) is a senior lawyer and a former Union law
minister. It is unfortunate that he sent the letter to the Speaker. He
has no business to interfere in the proceedings of the legislature,"
Constitutional expert P P Rao, who is the lawyer for the disqualified
BJP MLAs in the Karnataka High Court, said the Speaker's ruling was
unconstitutional. "The Speaker couldn't have disqualified the MLAs.
They have not resigned from the party. All that they have done is to
declare their lack of faith in the present Chief Minister. This can't
be a ground for any action by the Speaker against them," Rao said.
However, a senior functionary of the Union Law Ministry, who has dealt
with such an issue in the past, told The Indian Express that while the
Speaker's action could be justified, the Governor's missive to the
Speaker was totally unconstitutional.
The controversial action of the Governor also did not find favour with
former Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee. "The Governor shouldn't
have done it. He has no such power. As for the issue of the Speaker's
decision, I will not comment on whatever he does inside the House. It
is a quasi-judicial power granted to the Speaker, which is subject to
judicial intervention. Personally, I feel this power shouldn't vest in
the Speaker. I have said so in my book too," Chatterjee said.
Union Law Minister M Veerappa Moily, however, found nothing wrong in
the Governor's action. He also declared the Speaker's action
unconstitutional. "The Speaker's decision was partisan. He has acted
in a manner that is unconstitutional. No notice was served to MLAs
before disqualifying them. No procedure was followed," Moily told
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this group are the complete responsibility of the writer. Either the moderators or the owners of the group do not have any responsibility either for the accuracy or the content of the messages one way or the other
The messages here are not considered as "SPAM" if the contact and remove information are given in the message.
To send messages IndianVoice@egroups.comIf you do not want to receive email digest, please go to membership and click the edit and click "No Email" then click save changes. You will not receive email digest but still you can look at messages posted at your will.
u will not receive email digest but still you can look at messages posted at your will.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: