Note! Aryavrt Government and Abhinav Bharat are fighting war against immoral usurper and lethal cultures. Our Bharat had several warriors, social reformers, saints and even kings. None of them fought against the root cause of human miseries viz. Christianity, Islam, Socialism, and Democracy. They had been fighting wars against the symptoms, not the sources. These cultures are fabricated to rob and enslave one and all. These cultures must go else human race won't survive. Since 300 B.C. we are the first to fight against real enemies. Help us, else be ready for doom.--
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bhavesh Merja <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [aryasamajonline] VEDIC CONCEPTION OF GOD ( god doesn't exist)
Cc: ramans shriman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Dear Brother Ramans Shriman ji,
I respect your spirit and views but I also expect from gentlemen use of gentle language - we all being followers of the same Vedic Ideals.
The English word "God" is used for Ishvar = Brahman by many great Vedic scholars and Translators like Pt. Ganga Prasad Upadhyay, Dr. Chiranjeev Bhardwaj, Swami Satya Prakash, Swami Vidyanand Saraswati, etc. I think even Swami Dayananda would have no objection for such use.
The book-title "Satyarth-Prakash" has been translated in many ways e.g. The Light of Truth (mostly), The Spot Light on Truth, Expose of Right Sense, etc.
On such issues we should have little liberal attitude. Dhrama, Guru, Vedic, Yoga, Sadhana, Atma - such words are now getting ground amongst English knowing people. If these are used in English in their original Sanskrit forms there would not be much difficulty in understanding.
Ultimately we use language or words to convey certain ideas to others. Ideas are more important and should be given prime importance. Yes, ambiguity should be avoided as far as possible.
= Bhavesh Merja
2010/11/25 ramans shriman <email@example.com>namaste bhavesh jiu hv once against mixed yr Macaulay rubbish into holy vedic Amrit by using the word GOD as equal to Ishwarwhy didn't to translate the word 'vedic' into some other word rather than keeping it a derivation of ved . what is the translation of ved ?????????? why didn't u use that word for ved ???????some people hv translated "Stayarth prakash" as 'light of truth'. this is rubbish. why ? coz they missed the word arth for which the holy maharishi struggled for life.(he struggled for the arth to correct it not to correct the original...)u r doing the same thing in another way.why?coz GOD doesn't exist........hv u read some where saying that GOD or ALLAH was also present some where near when sarshti kartaa ishwar cerated this srasti? or alah or god created the srastiGod and allah came in to existence when some illiterate people now called prophets cerated them for their own purpose.so god and allah are created imaginary items not the creators themselves or any thing real...so pl refrain from mixing yr own n macaulay's pond water into holy Vedic Amrit