Think for human races.
Indian Constitution is predator, a pirate, and a terrorist. Its Article 29(1) motivates aids, abets and harbours its Muslim and Christian mercenaries to eradicate Vedic culture through murder and mayhem. If we wish to survive, we have no choice than understanding Democracy, Islam and Christianity. They have dogmas capable of corrupting men to such an extent that they believe plunder, murder, rape of women and conversion sure path to paradise. Human race must note that ignorance of this deception is not tolerance. Acceptance is not compassion. Appeasement will not lead to peace any more than accommodating the suicide bombers, who have ruined world harmony. Over 1.3 billion people are slaves of Islam and over two billion people are wisdom less (Bible, Genesis 2:17) sheep slaves (Bible, Luke 19:27) of Jesus. The word Islam means submission. Allah and his Koran and Jehovah and his Bible Command Muslims and Christians obey prophet, cleric, and king. While Muslims in Islamic nations live with no libertys of thought, speech, press, or religion, the status of Christians is of sheep without wisdom! Unemployment, poverty, and despair run rampant in Islamic countries. Every aspect of a Muslim's life is controlled by Islamic despots, Islamic law, Islamic scripture, Islamic education, and Islamic culture. Women are treated like animals. Allah's Koran gives Muslims the liberty to beat their wives and condones rape of any captive women (Koran 23:6). While every Muslim is indoctrinated with the same message of religious intolerance, racial hatred, and violence in Islam, Christianity is after establishing kingdom of bastard and ghost Jesus. Bible, Luke 19:27. They are being exploited by their dictators and politicians. They hear from media, from their teachers, and clerics and follow them at the cost of annihilation of human race. A collusion of influences, including lust for booty and sex has annihilated truth and shut out wisdom.
Muslims and Jews must thank Vedic culture for their survival. They are alive, because Vedic culture could not be eradicated. No sooner, Vedic culture would be eradicated; Jews and Muslims would be eradicated within short time. This is because of the fact that with all his might the so-called supreme Allah could not supersede Muslims over Christians' population. Even in Science, technology, arms and deception, Muslims are far behind than Christians. 27 Islamic countries could not defeat small Israel. How would they protect themselves from Christians? Now Muslims are scared for the US occupation upon Iraq and Afghanistan. How would they protect their Islamic countries on the face of the commands of Jesus to slay those, who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27). Muslim historians proudly tell us as to how many women were sold in Baghdad market and how many women were raped by Muhammad, after robbing and killing their near and dear. However, no sooner Serbs raped Muslim women and returned pregnant Muslims' women to Muslims and when Israel killed civilians in Lebanon, Muslims cried for violation of human rights. Do non-Muslims have no human rights? The worst threat is to the women of Aryans and those dictator proletariats, who are neither Muslims nor Christians. It goes to reflect another important stupidity of Muslim (Koran 23:6) and Christian (Bible, Isaiah 13:16) women, who are breeding their own enemies as well as enemies of human race. When would you protect citizens' women on the face of the command of Bible to ravish Muslim women before the eyes of Muslims? (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)--
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture & even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy & get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith & life with dignity?
The British gave India back to their own stooges, the ideal duo to destroy
India "by Constitution" having conquered her by "Sword & Gun" earlier.
One was the "servant of islam" (Gandhi), the other a sworn ENEMY of Hindus
and at the same time a great admirer of foreigners (Nehru).
Barrister Nehru, in particular, knew that to destroy the Hindus he had to
reduce their TERRITORY and NUMBERS and destroy their UNITY and MORALE
(SPIRIT). He would show his contempt of everything Hindu. He would deny them
recognition in public and any mention in Constitution. He would avoid their
company in public, ridicule them, never smile at them, never consult them on
any State matter, never appreciate their genius and achievements but give
key posts to Muslims and Christians. He would take Maulana Abul Kalam Azad
and Edwina Mountbatten for his constant companions while his propaganda
machines described him as a patriot and a great freedom fighter.
In the event when the British left it was Nehru who cried the most,
begging of the Viceroy to stay on in office as Governor General. He gave a
ceremonial send off at Mumbai docks to the last British military unit leaving
India. At the same time he called the Jawans of Indian National Army (INA)
traitors and dismissed them all in disgrace! Any fool could see Nehru's love
of India and our Jawans.
Nehru's Constitution neglected none more than the brave armed forces of
the country who were seen as a symbol of aggression meant to be disbanded in
disgrace under Gandhi's ethos of "Ahimsa Parmo Dharma" after Nehru assumed
the role of moral master of the world. Unconditional surrender of Lahore
and withdrawal from East Bengal were their worst HUMILIATION and the lowest
point of their self esteem, pride and honour. The only victory worth
celebrating by them was turned into shame & disappointment when East Bengal was
returned to the ENEMY after its capture by our Jawans. The army is still
smarting under their previous humiliation through "cease fires" and
Nehru's Constitution was meant to push the Hindus to back row, ensuring
only bad news for them. For this he gave the Muslims free hand to massacre
the Hindus, starting with Noakhali, later West Punjab and finally the
complete extermination of Hindus in North Kashmir. One never saw Nehru sad even
for a second over the rape and abduction of tens of thousands of Hindu
girls whom we regard "devis".
It was, in deed, the extension of the British colonial policy of
suppressing the Hindus in order to continuously demoralise them, Hindu temples,
being Nehru's special target, never got any protection as per Constitution.
Nehru's Constitution was utterly useless with regard to large scale
conversions of Hindus to foreign religions since Partition, that itself was his
deliberate State policy. Thus the Hindus have always been getting bad news
starting with the surrender of territory on historic scale.
Broken and bleeding India began with her DEFEAT at Partition after which
the country emerged in greatly reduced borders. Did anyone see Nehru show
remorse or regret? In fact the clever FOREIGN AGENT NEHRU turned the worst
ever historic defeat and surrender into India's "Independence"!
Operation "Blue Star" (attack on Harimandir Sahib) in Amritsar in June
1984 was the extension of Nehru's policy of weakening the Hindus by
destroying the Sikhs. Indira's propaganda machine described it as her patriotic act
but never mentioned her HIGH TREASON when she returned East Bengal to the
enemy after its capture or when she schemed against the Tamils (of INDIAN
origin) in Sri Lanka who desperately needed "Mother India" for help.
Diaspora in the eyes of Nehru was extension of Hindu India and, therefore,
to be IGNORED or treated with contempt. His Constitution does not
recognise them or extend protection to them in any way. Hindus are as vulnerable in
South Kashmir as in Malaysia.
The litmus test of this Constitution are two words, "KHANS" and "SONIA".
The former reign supreme in Bollywood and the latter reigns supreme in
For the Hindus, both men and women, it is the Constitution "of the enemy,
by the enemy and FOR THE ENEMY." It does not lay down strictly, "No
conversion of Hindus!" and "No conversion of Hindu girls at marriage!"
Indians still laugh & celebrate on January 26th and August 15th every year
but not weep & cry.
COMMENT ON CONSTITUTION
(CELEBRATING THE LIMBLESS WINGLESS HINDU BASHING REPUBLIC)
The Constitution of India has demoralised the nation to the extent that
the COMBINED "public opinion" of ONE BILLION can neither "show the door" to
the Italian-born symbol of European Reoccupation (Indian version of
Columbus) or try RAJIV, the BOFORS CHOR, in any court of Law.
Because of this treacherous Constitution the HINDUS today are in more
precarious situation in South Asia than before the Constitution was enacted
in January 1950.
Background knowledge of
-Hindu DISUNITY due to centuries of slavery,
-Devastatingly destructive role of Islam and Christianity in ENSLAVED
-Hindus' suicidal inability to provide strong, resolute and inspiring
LEADERSHIP in order to lead them to victory in fight for "Akhand Bharat", and
to ensure the honour and dignity of native womanhood (Italian born Sonia
Maino) and manhood (the Khans of Bollywood).
-The "I am all right, Jack" mentality of the Hindus. It means universal
apathy and detachment towards the suffering fellow Hindus. When West Punjab
and East Bengal were being ethnically cleansed in violence and bloodshed
not one Muslim was "touched" in U.P. and Maharashtra or thrown out of
Kerala and Tamil Nadu. On the contrary, we see Mujahideen from as far afield
as Bangladesh, Pakistan, Somalia and even Chechnya, fighting along side
the local terrorists in South Kashmir. British born Muslims have gone to
Afghanistan to kill the British soldiers. Hindus in Bharat did not teach the
Muslims a lesson when South Kashmir was ethnically cleansed in 1989.
-The nature of "HINDU BASHING" ruling political party,
-The perpetual rule of ONE anti national and corrupt Dynasty.
is an essential pre-requisite to understand this Comment.
The Indian RULING ESTABLISHMENT will "celebrate" Bharat's (Middle India'
s) REPUBLIC DAY on 26th. January. On this date in 1950 her new Constitution
was enacted. Let us expose the COWARDICE and TREACHERY of its writers.
What we call "India" or "Bharat" is in reality MIDDLE INDIA. The
Constitution ought to have stated Pakistan and Bangladesh as Western India and
Eastern India respectively. The Constitution of West Germany did not
accept the division of the country in order to acknowledge the existence of
The last civil war in India (1947) was FOUGHT between the Muslims
(aggressors) and "The Rest." (defenders). The next war too will be fought between
"The Rest" and the Muslims.
Last time the Muslims had full support of the Christians (the British).
The next time, too, the Muslims will have the full support of the Christians
(Italians). What guidance does one get from the Constitution of India with
this regard? Constitution is supposed to be the eyes and ears of a blind
The first tragic thing about the Constitution is that it "stinks" of anti
Hindu bias. And it further "stinks" of TREASON by not mentioning "Akhand
Bharat" to which the whole nation, not only Mr. MK Gandhi & Bandit JL
Nehru, were supposedly committed till the "last drop of blood in their bodies".
Therefore, as per Constitution the blood in India is water that can be
coloured green in Lahore but left pale yellow in Delhi.
The "Vidhan" does not mention the five provinces that were meant to be
integral part of AKHAND BHARAT. They had been surrendered unconditionally-
without referendum, reason, challenge or FIGHT to the indigenous Muslims two
and a half years earlier. The Muslims of India had the "royal" privilege
to move over to the newly created ISLAMIC countries, or stay put back in
India to enjoy full citizenship rights as per Constitution.
No Indian citizenship can buy any property in South Kashmir as per
Constitution. (Article 370).
Two million Indians were massacred and 15 million forcibly expelled from
their ancestral homes. Such an unprecedented large scale exodus had never
before taken place in India's entire history. But it finds no mention in
Constitution showing that the top leaders Gandhi and Nehru regarded the PEOPLE
OF INDIA as Hitler regarded the Jews.
There is no mention of a Memorial to the Holocaust of 1947. The
Constitution does not refer to the slavery of KARACHI and DHAKA while declaring
DELHI independent. The by-products of this Constitution are THREE flags
(Pakistan, Bharat and Bangladesh) flying in the capital of India where a yielding
conceding appeasing, gentle and uninspiring Shrimati occupies Rashtrapati
Bhawan as the Supreme Commander and President.
There had been countless Muslim invasions and continuous occupation of
DELHI since 1192 AD but never were vast areas (one third of India) evacuated
by the HINDUS as in 1947 due to historic collapse by barristers NEHRU &
The Constitution reflects the most humiliating defeat and surrender of
SECULARISM while the leaders claimed to be staunchly committed to secularism.
Obviously, the Constitution regards secularism mandatory only for the
Hindus and the Sikhs but NOT for the Muslims. The Sikh who shouts, "Secularism
to be acceptable in Amritsar has to be RAMMED DOWN THEIR THROATS in Lahore,"
runs the risk of being put behind bars for life.
Here are the main flaws in this Constitution-
1. No mention of the unconditional surrender of Secularism, Do countries
abandon their fundamental commitments so quickly like this?
2. Unconditional surrender of vast TERRITORIES. What is the meaning of
3. Not defining the Muslims as traitors or separatists at the same moment
when Bandit NEHRU saw the "glow of his own freedom". At the outbreak of
World War 2 all the German and Japanese citizens in America and England
were interned and not released till the end of war. In India the Constitution
declared them to be as patriotic as the loyal Hindus. This was the ugliest
joke on all the people of Bharat.
4. While LAHORE is outside the ambit of this Constitution SRINAGAR is
not. The result? Total loss of tourism and Hindu life and property in extreme
5. Obvious bias against the majority community (the HINDUS) but at the
same time showing excessive concern for the well-being and advancement of the
MUSLIMS, e.g. Hajj subsidies and reservation of jobs.
6. The State of Jammu & Kashmir was conceded special and separate
identity vide Article 370. Nehru desperately needed the violence and unrest there
to take the nation's mind OFF his own treason at partition. That is why he
ordered our advancing troops to stop dead, and not move on, to recover
North Kashmir fully.
7. While India is the fountainhead of true RELIGIONS on earth, something
that was to be celebrated with great joy and pride, the Constitution does
not reflect this at all but treats native and FOREIGN religions at par. In
Ayodhya the Mohammed of Arabia is put above Sri Rama of BHARAT. A
Constitution that does not defend and lift the image of the country's OWN divine
genius is not worth the paper it is written on. For betraying India's own
divine beings, her constitution is a document of national shame. "Gaurav" will
remain a mere word, not a reality.
None of the native Avataras, Rishis and Gurus is mentioned even once in
this Constitution. It ought to have begun with a Shloka in Sanskrit from
8. This Constitution gives no direction to ensure that the SUPREME
COMMANDER of MIDDLE INDIA must be a COMMITTED HINDU. A wrong person, a devious
Muslim or Christian can easily occupy this post and ensure the destruction
and defeat of the Indian Army. This Constitution plays with the very security
& survival of the Republic.
9. The Constitution adopted the same flag for the country that belonged
to All-India Congress Party with one change. Instead of "charkha (spinning
wheel) MIDDLE INDIA was to have ASHOKA CHAKRA on its flag. This was a
concession to Dr Ambedkar, a Buddhist, whose disdain of Hindu religion was
similar to that of JL Nehru.
10. Against popular demand for "VANDE MATRAM" as the national anthem the
Constituent Assembly chose "JANA GANA MANA" at the behest of Jenab JL
Nehru, half Muslim himself.
11. What direction, impulse or guideline does this Constitution provide
to the State to ensure the safety of the people of INDIAN origin living
abroad, e.g., UGANDA, FIJI, BANGLADESH, PAKISTAN, KASHMIR, NEPAL, SRI LANKA,
MALAYSIA and AUSTRALIA? Its outlook on the EXPATRIATE Indians is that of a
flock of sheep who passively watch the wolf carrying off one of them for his
meal. In several countries DUAL NATIONALITY is granted automatically as per
Constitution in order to facilitate initiative and travel but NOT in
Having said all this, one can ask, "What should have been a proper
Constitution for MIDDLE INDIA?"
What was a genuinely patriotic HINDU Prime Minister of the newly
independent BHARAT expected to do?
1. Declare Middle India as HINDU RASHTRA if separatist breakaway
countries on EITHER SIDE had to be ISLAMIC. The world sees clear identity of
Pakistan as an Islamic State while India lives on under mongrel Ideology and
expected to remain an unstable country where everyone would fight for own
rights and privileges. Clearly, Secularism to be decent in DELHI had to be
rammed down their throats in LAHORE.
2. The Constitution had to designate the MUSLIMS as "persona non grata"
or "guest workers" like the TURKS in Germany.
3. The Constitution had to spell out clearly that only a COMMITTED &
PRACTISING HINDU could become the Supreme Commander and the Prime Minister, as
also the Governors of the States.
4. A new FLAG had to be designed with NO resemblance with the flag of any
5. "Vande Matram" had to be the national anthem of Bharat.
6. THE Truncated province of Punjab had to be given a new name to match
REALITY. The new name could be DOAB (Land of Two Rivers) or simply EAST
PUNJAB that rhymes with WEST BENGAL.
7. The Constitution had to stipulate the final date for the closure of
all the seditious MUSLIM universities like Aligarh and Deoband, and sanction
the establishment of HINDU universities, at least one per State.
8. The aspiration to unify the country had to be clearly stated. In the
Constitution of West Germany this was stated in Article 1. The patriotic
Germans did NOT accept two Germanys. Thus any East German escaping to the
West was automatically given the German citizenship and rehabilitated. Such
patriotism and genius was totally lacking in those "mental dwarfs / former
slaves" who framed the Constitution of Partitioned Indian Secular State.
9. The status of the MAJORITY community, the HINDUS, remained as low "as
per Constitution" as it was during the British Raj when the Christians used
to ally themselves with the MUSLIMS- both being foreigners, against the
NATIVE Hindus. Partition itself was the proof of that core "unity of purpose"
of the foreigners and their animosity towards the Hindus.
A Constitution is like the rudder of a ship, small yet powerful enough to
keep the ship on course. The ship called "BHARAT" has a hull that is
leaking on every side. It is sailing on an erroneous course. There is no
provision in Constitution for ejecting the corrupt captain and crew like body
waste. Scoundrels in top families, like Rajiv Gandhi, can get away with
importing brides from abroad, thus degrading native womanhood. There is also no
provision to try and punish goons like BOFORS CHOR and confiscate their
The Constitution of India engenders NO loyalty to the country or its
TERRITORY. It proved useless when Indira Gandhi returned our own territory
(East Bengal) back to the ENEMY after its capture in 1972. There was NOTHING
in Constitution to stop her from doing so. She could not be tried for HIGH
TREASON and executed or hanged to death for that crime. In sharp contrast we
see the Constitutions of Pakistan and Bangladesh that prohibit the return
of territory to India under any circumstances.
This "Vidhan" of Bandit Jawaharlal NEHRU does not specify whether the
country's identity is HINDU or MONGREL. In contrast the United Kingdom is a
CHRISTIAN country with her own State religion (Church of England). The
Constitution does not commend ONE LAW FOR ALL. In some parts of Bharat the
Muslims have their own Sharia Law.
The Constitution does not defend the rights and dignity of girls being
seduced, married and CONVERTED. There is NO assurance to the nation that its
Secularism will be guaranteed if the Muslims OUTNUMBER the Hindus due to
disproportionate increase in their numbers. It has NO provision to ensure that
the foreigners do not convert the natives with incentives and rewards.
The Hindu "LION" was put in the cage called "VIDHAN" and continuously
starved. Weak and emaciated, and lacking self confidence and self esteem, it
says to one Abdul Kalam, "Sir, be our supreme commander and you do not have
to be a Hindu," and to one Sonia Maino, "Madam, become our prime minister
and we will also have your son rule us for ever. He may, if he so desires,
bring his bride from Venezuela, Malaysia or Columbia." Where on earth do
we see such despicable COLLAPSE of the whole nation?
The pathetic plight of the Hindus from Kashmir to Kerala is the proof
that the quality of the Constitution that was inflicted on MIDDLE INDIA was
(and still remains) pathetic.
The Constitution of the UNITED States of America has such vigorous and
dynamic impulses going out that the attack of Nine Eleven resulted in the
destruction of the Government of Taliban in Afghanistan. The Constitution of
Middle India lacks vitality to the extent that despite the claims the
Indian army has not been able to advance even one centimetre across the "cease
The WORST thing about this Constitution is that it regards India's
existence from MIDNIGHT 14/15 August 1947 with full compliments to the cowards
who agreed to the surrender of India. Had Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose been
alive no one would have dared to cut, chop and fragment India in this
vulgar manner or invaded Kashmir. Regrettably, there is little mention of the
great Hindu Kings and the indigenous civilisation of the past.
Let the nation judge for itself and then scrap this Document of TREACHERY,
and write up a new one to recognise the GENIUS and POTENTIAL of Hindu
nation or even to match the vigour and dynamic of the Constitution of the
United States of America. The era of "Indian Coolie" is LONG PAST.
26 January 2010 ===========
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]