Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Re: [ATC] H. R. 4646 - 1% transfer tax on all bank transactions.

And this booty would be paid to the terrorists of Pakistan, to slay you because you do not worship the traitor Allah alone 
-- 
Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?
***
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 2:43 AM, midenise <midenise@zahav.net.il> wrote:
 



--- On Tue, 10/26/10, alice r. wrote:

Check this with Snopes - the bill is still in committee and will probably be brought out during the lame duck session. If it comes out and passes, the effects will be horrific. My paychecks are deposited directly into the bank. I write checks and have
automatic withdrawals.

------------------------------------------------------

H. R. 4646

I went into THOMAS (Library of Congress) and printed out and read all 15 pages of this bill, which has the short title of "Debt Free America Act." It is the most demogogic thing I have ever read. Just think, if you deposit $5,000.00 into your checking or savings account the bank has to take out 1% or $50.00 and send it to Washington. Any checks or cash you take out of your bank, it will deduct 1% from the transaction and give it to the Treasury .

Page 9 declares that the House and Senate shall begin debate not later than November 23, 2010 and page 11 states the vote on passage shall occur not later than December 23, 2010.

The bill is HR-4646 introduced by

US Rep Peter DeFazio Dem-Oregon and

US Senator Tom Harkin Dem-Iowa.

It is now in committee and will probably not be brought out until after the November elections.

A Senate finance team recommends a new tax and plans to sneak it in after the November election to keep it under the radar.

This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution, e.g. your bank or credit union. Any deposit or withdrawal that

you make or cash that you move, like from your savings account to your checking account will have a 1% tax charged.

If your paycheck or your social security or whatever is direct deposit, 1% tax charged.

If you hand carry a check or bring cash in to deposit, 1% tax charged,

Some will say "aw it's just 1%."

But once the tax is in effect, they can raise it as they see fit.

http://www.standard.net/node/44797


--------------------

Thank you,
USA TODAY

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___




Monday, October 11, 2010

Saffron terrorism


 


 


 

MCOCA REVIVED?


 

To,

His Excellency Mr. Ban Ki Moon,

Secretary General,

United Nations Organisation,

Through,

United Nations Information Center,

55, Lodi Estate, New Delhi - 110 003.

Hon'ble Your Excellency,

Your Excellency may peruse the order on ATS Appeal in Malegaon mosque bomb blast on our website:

http://www.aryavrt.com/mcoca-revived

http://www.aryavrt.com/Home/writ-against-azaan

With the blessings of our Chancellor, Jagatguru Swami Shri Amritanand Devtirth of JandK, along with his 11 subordinates, who are in jail now in Malegaon blast conspiracy, for opposing mosques, wherefrom Muslims abuse our Ishwar and Vedic Sanaatan Dharm, I am Press Secretary of Aryavrt Government. I need nations, who are determined to drive Christianity and Islam out of the face of the world. I request such nations to come forward and support us to eradicate Christianity and Islam and revive Vedic Sanaatan Dharm to salvage human race,

Deprived of the Article 3 ("Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.") of the 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights', we, seek protection.

As long as one would tolerate Christianity and Islam and their protector the predator and pirate Indian Constitution, one would be driven like sheep of Jesus and like Kafir of Allah. One would remain deprived of one's freedom of faith, right of life and property. We declare, "We would not tolerate criminal cultures of Christianity and Islam."

I agree with Daniel Webster who said, "There is no nation on earth powerful enough to accomplish our overthrow. Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence. ... I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants... they may be made the dupes of designing men and become the instruments of their own undoing."

http://www.haindavakeralam.com/hkpage.aspx?PageID=11174&SKIN=W

A High court or apex court judge has to take oath to uphold the Indian Constitution as per Schedule III forms IV and VIII. Governors take oath to defend the Indian Constitution as per Article 159. Governors and Judges, who administer oath to each other, have taken oath to defend and uphold the conservation of the language, script, or culture of the minorities. We, Vedic Panthies, are minority among the minorities of the world as such claim first right upon the resources of Bharat. Governors and judges are committing crime of not defending our Vedic culture, Sanskrit language and Devnagari Script. There is minority commission for Muslims and Christians to slay us, the Vedic Panthies.

We, Vedic Panthies are proud to belong to Vedic Sanaatan Dharm, which has taught the world both tolerance and universal acceptance. While Aryans' communal Vedic Culture has sheltered the persecuted and the refugees of all religions and all nations of earth, secular
Christianity or Islam have annihilated every culture it has invaded or immigrated to. The total time for annihilation might take centuries, but once Christianity and Islam are ascendant they never fail. The host culture disappears and becomes extinct. They are after last partially survived Vedic Sanaatan Dharm.

In lieu of providing shelter, Christianity and Islam are thanking us by depriving us from lives, our motherland, demolishing our worship places, raping our women, usurping our belongings and assassinating us with the support of our own people.

Muslims' Allah and his Islam have divided humanity between Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad. (Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to either secure heavenly brothel or honour of Ghazi with ownership of Kafirs' land, women and properties. Similarly, Christians' Jesus commands his sheep Christians' to slay those, who do not accept Jesus their king. (Bible, Luke 19:27). Hence we Vedic Panthies have no security of life.

They are after the last partially survived Vedic culture. Generosity of Aryans has become their vice! We cannot salvage Vedic culture. The Indian Constitution has been compiled by the Britons' Congress Party in retaliation and to settle vendetta for opposing British rule. As such we demand application of 'Universal Declaration of Human Rights'.


 


 

Yours faithfully,

Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi (Press Secretary)

Dated: Monday, October 11, 2010

Re: Fw: [SDF] History of tirtha and Ayodhya verdict as a historical narrative (Part 3)

Thank you for your feedback, Tyagi Ji.
Court has once again cheated us. 
May peruse my Web site
http://www.aryavrt.com/ayodhya-decision-a-fraud.


--
Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?
))))===
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 5:17 AM, bhagavaandaas tyaagi <bhagavaandaas@yahoo.ca> wrote:


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: S. Kalyanaraman <kalyan97@gmail.com>
Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 9:59:04 AM
Subject: [SDF] History of tirtha and Ayodhya verdict as a historical narrative (Part 3)

 


The Central Government which controls the land should hand it over to Sri Rama, consistent with the title established by law.
The nazrul land, unpartitioned, unbroken living space should belong to Sri Rama.
samAne Urve adhi sangatAsah sam jAnate na yatante mitha-s-te te devAnAm na minanti vratAnyamardhanto vasubhir-yAdamAnAh (RV. vii.76.5)
being united with common people they become of one mind; they strive together as it were, nor do they injure the rituals of the gods, non-injuring each other they move with wealth. (SAyaNa explains samAne Urve सामने ऊर्वे as cattle -- common property of all: sarveSAm sAdhAraNe go-samUhe). 
सर्वेषाम साधारण गोसमुहे




जाति  देशा काल  समय  अनिविच्छिन्नः सार्वभौमः 
तद्व्र  महाव्रतम 

 (Trans. The mahaavratam is (performed in) universal, unbroken, unpartitioned  living space and regions, time and particular moments.) 

kalyan


On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:23 AM, S. Kalyanaraman <kalyan97@gmail.com> wrote:

The historical narraive of Ayodhya verdict continues from the sublime to the secular to pin down the ownership issue of 'nazrul' land, the 'disputed' site of Ayodhya:

4306…The Barhaspatyasutra (edited by Dr. F.W. Thomas) mentions eight great tirthas each of Visnu, Siva and Sakti, that yield all siddhis." (pages 677-678).

4307. The above book at page 736 under the heading "List of tirthas" says:
"Ayodhya--(in Fyzabad District in U.P.) on the Ghagra. One of the seven holy cities (vide p. 678n above). It is also a place of pilgrimage of Jains, as some of their
saints were born there. Atharva-veda X. 2. 31 and Tai, A.

27. 2 (astacakra navadvara devanam pur-Ayodhya) tasyam hiranyayah kosah svargo loko Jyotisavrtah II), V. 60. 24-25 and 70. 2 (capital of king Rtuparna and of Rama), Br. IV.
40. 91. Ag. 109. 24 (Ayodya papanasan). According to Ram, I. 5. 5-7 the country of Kosala had Sarayu flowing through it; Ayodhya, 12 yojanas long and three broad, was kosala capital founded by Manu. Kosala was one of the 16 mahajanapadas of India in ancient times (vide Anguttara Nikaya, vol. IV. p. 252). Later on, Kosala was divided into two, viz. Uttara Kosala and Daksina Kosala divided by the Sarju or Ghagra river. The Raghuvamsa holds Ayodhya to
be capital of Uttarakosala (VI. 71 and IX. 1). Vide also Va. 88. 20 ff. For a long line of kings of Ayodhya from Iksvaku and P. VI. 208. 46-47 (for Daksina Kosala and Uttara Kosala). Saketa is generally identified with Ayodhya. Vide T.P. p. 496 (gives its boundaries from SK) and under Saketa. Dr. B.C. Law contributes a well documented and learned paper on 'Ayodhya' to J. of the Ganganath Jha R. Society, vol. I, pp. 423-443."
4308. Sri Mishra submits that Ayodhya and its relation with Lord Rama as his place of birth is well recognised and mentioned in ancient Hindu Literature. The existence of "Vedi"
at the disputed place is mentioned by Father Joseph Tieffenthaler in his work, translated in French titled as
"Description Historique Et Geographique Del'inde" first published in 1787 by Jean Bernoulli.

4381… Whether it is 3000 year old or 5000 year old or more than a few lacs year old may not be of much consequence for us. Today, Christianity is more than 2000 and Islam 143 years old. We should not be understood saying that before Islam as propounded by Prophet Muhammad or Christianity as per the teaching of the Jesus Christ, there was no religion whatsoever, but this is what normally or commonly understand. The religious scriptures and literatures of the religions therefore, though in abundance conform to the point of view, requirement and necessities of the corresponding period. Because of its own certain antiquity amongst Hindu scriptures, we find sometimes, mention of such things which become difficult to digest on our conceivable notion and logic and the limitation of our understanding which we have in the light of the information available to us currently.
4382. May be on account of non availability of the reliable feed back some of the aspects of Hindu scriptures are termed by others as Myth, legend, epic etc., doubting its historicity, ignoring the fact that the common people are so deep embedded in blood that it is beyond imagination for them to even think of a situation where those faith and belief can be termed as a mere fiction and not a matter of historicity. For example, the two of the world's biggest works known as 'Ramayana' and 'Mahabharatha' of Hindu scriptures, other people started to call it 'Epic' and that we have followed since the days of British India and now also. Initially the European writers in their own understanding find it unthinkable even the existence of such an antique society and culture and that too so perfect and so well defined, sophisticated, but complicated in different facets. With the passage of time the thoughts and approach have undergone a sea of change and now we find quite a sectionable intelligentsia
who is changing its views and that is not merely on some kind of altered hypothesis etc., but due to the cemented, reliable information, they have collected in the mean time. In brief, it
can be said that merely because I am not able to trace my history of succession it will not mean that I do not have a chain of succession. One's inability in finding something cannot result in a conclusion that actually nothing existed. There has to be much more. The mathematical, astronomical calculation of the learned  people in ancient India have been found to be reasonably correct though they are presumed to lack so called advanced technology for arriving at such conclusions. It is easy to discard something at the threshold but difficult to find reason and logic behind its existence. Difficulty cannot be a reason to opt for an easier method instead of the cumbersome one. If Indian culture and society could have survived for such a long time even though other ancient cultures, whether Egyptian, Greek or Roman have lost behind the time, then one has to find out the reason for its sustenance. It cannot be brushed aside loosely. This is a kind of approach, thoughts, faith and belief of one part of the litigants before us and their contemporary opponent wants in existence of
positive material irrespective of the time and antiquity matter relates to. The reason being that the issue has been brought in a Court of law which is presently governed by the system we have inherited from a totally different culture i.e. British legacy where they have told us to decide the dispute only on getting evidence and not otherwise. The issues relating to faith and belief and that too, which had continued from generations to generations, from hundreds and thousands years neither depend on the so called existence of evidence nor one can shake such custom which they have received by tradition for want of evidence. It is not totally a different concept and notion, independent in its own ways. In the erstwhile territory of India, before entry of the far east people or from other parts of world it appears that natives had their own traditions, system, faith and belief, and the society had different kinds of religious concept.The subsequent scholars tried to bifurcate this religious system
of ancient India into that of Aryan and Dravidian but what we find is that barring a few differences in the matter of system of worship etc., the core belief and faith remained same. The entire society remained connected with a common thread of religious faith. This difference, more or less, was political. It is in this system, where we find the people in ancient India believed in the Avtaars of God which found mention in Vedic texts. All
these Avtaars in one or the other way we find had a specific objective and ultimately helped to save the world, human being and other creatures and also to guide the living being in lives,
some are to attract the people back to the spiritual domain. 

4383. On the one hand when modern day's science believe in the system of universe controlled by various principle of energy, then Indian Society was glued with a common platform by the learned sages and others telling that the Supreme Lord maintains all the planets and universe. It is He who assume roles and incarnation to perform pastimes to reclaim those in the mode of goodness. They were led to believe that throughout the
many millions of Universe in which the Supreme Being appears, the objective is to apprise Society and bring it to senses, in particular, one who are in the higher grades of consciousness, receptive to understand their spiritual relation with him. He also sends his pure representatives and instruction to guide people. The object is common i.e. to bind the living beings back towards the spiritual world. It is also said that source of various Avtaars
within this cosmic creation is the Lord of the Universe i.e. Garbhodakashayi Vishnu (see Srimad Bhagwatam 1.3.5). The form of the Lord, that descends to the material world to create, is called Avtaar.
4384. We are not going into that various Avtars of Lord Vishnu according to the Hindu tradition and in details thereof. Since Ayodhya is known by the name of Lord Rama and,
therefore, one can presume that the religious structures must have connection with Lord Rama in one or the other way. The stone inscription found in 1992, as we have already discussed, at least show this much that a temple of Vishnu Hari was constructed by the erstwhile Gahadwal King in 11th or 12th century, i.e., much before the visit of Babar near Ayodhya. In no other record, reference of Vishnu Hari Mandir at Ayodhya has been pointed out, meaning thereby, before the history of Hinduism started in writing in a proper way, that temple must have disappeared for one or the other reason. At Ayodhya, the people used to visit for Darshan of Lord Rama's places is also evident from the record of Sikh religion showing that Guru Nanak Dev Ji came to Ayodhya in 1510 or 1511, told his companion that it is the birthplace of Lord Rama and then went for Darshan. Even for a moment we are not drawing any inference that the Sikhs religious texts anywhere identify the place of birth of Lord Rama but this is sufficient to point out that even before the entry of Babar in the then Hindustan,
Ayodhya was already a well established Hindu Tirtha for the followers and believers of Lord Rama. The custom of worship of Lord Rama has already begun long back.
4390. In the middle of 19th century, i.e., as we have already observed, between the 1853 to 1855 there appears to be a major confrontation between Hindu and Muslims at Ayodhya resulting in hundreds of deaths. Some says that 75 muslims were slained while others say that the actual figure was about 200 Hindus and 75 Muslims. Be that as it may, that is not very relevant for the point in issue. We are concerned as to what impel the two communities to fought so frightfully that resulted in such a large number of casualties, if the disputed place was an ordinary place of worship of muslims having no other history or antiquity
attached with it. The conduct, the attitude, the insistence on the part of Hindus, continuously, atleast as is evident from the record, i.e., from the time of Tieffenthaler and onwards, show that it was for something really serious on account whereof
Hindus were not able to give up their claim. Probably for this reason, despite all odds, they continued to pursue their claim at the place in dispute. (Vol.20.pdf)
4428. It is not disputed by the parties before this Court that the Nazul plot, in which the building in dispute existed, was recorded as Nazul, plot no. 583, Khasra of 1931 of Mohalla Kot
Ram Chandra known as Ramkot, City Ayodhya (Nazul Estate Ayodhya). In the revenue records, plot number is different. The Nazul number of the plot in which the building in dispute situate is not disputed. It is also admitted by all the parties that the plot in which disputed building existed was recorded Nazul in the First Settlement 1861 and had continued so even when the suit in question was filed.
4429. "Nazul land" means land owned by the Government. It is the own pleading of Sunni Board in para 24(B) of the written statement filed in Suit-5. 

4430. In the Legal Glossary 1992, fifth edition, published by the Legal Department of the Government of India at page 589, the meaning of the word "Nazul" has been given as
"Rajbhoomi i.e. Government land". It is an Arabic word and it refers to a land annexed to Crown. During the British Regime, immoveable property of individuals, Zamindars, Nawabs and
Rajas when confiscated for one or the other reason, it was termed as "Nazul property". The reason being that neither it was acquired nor purchased after making payment. In the old record, we are told when they used to be written in Urdu, this kind of land was shown as "Jaidad Munzabta". 
4431. For dealing with such property under the authority of the Lt. Governor of North Western provinces, two orders were issued in October, 1846 and October, 1848 wherein after
the words "Nazul property" its english meaning was given as "Escheats to the Government". Sadar Board of Revenue on 20th May, 1845 issued a circular order in reference to Nazul land and in para 2 thereof it mentioned "The Government is the proprietor of those land and no valid title to them can be derived but from the Government." The Nazul land was also termed as confiscated estate. Under circular dated 13th July, 1859, issued by the Government of North Western Provinces, every Commissioner was obliged to keep a final confiscation statement of each district and lay it before the Government for orders. The kingdom of Oudh was annexed by East India Company in 1856. It declared the entire land as vested in the Government and thereafter settled the land to various individuals Zamindars, Nawabs etc.
4432. At Lucknow revolt against the British Company broke up in May, 1857 which is known as the first war of independence which very quickly angle a substantial part of north western provinces. After failure of the above revolution, the then Governor General Lord Canning on 15th May, 1858 issued a proclamation confiscating propriety rights in the soil with the exception of five or six persons who had given support and assistance to British Officers. This land was resettled first for a period of three years and then permanent propriety rights were given to certain Talukdars and Zamindars by grant of 'Sanad' under Crown Grants Act. In the meantime we all know that under the Government of India Act, 1858 the entire Indian
territory under the control of East India Company was placed under Crown w.e.f. First November, 1858.
4457. This issue pertains to the identification of the property in dispute as described in the plaint. Counsel for defendants No.4 and 5 submitted that the suit as framed show the property in respect whereto relief was sought as mentioned in the annexures no.1, 2 and 3 to the plaint and do not specify of the boundaries of the property in respect whereto Suit-5 was
filed. However, so far as the disputed site and structure is concerned, there is no dispute between the parties in respect thereto either about its identification or description. After the
decision of the Apex Court in Dr. M. Ismail Farooqui's case (supra) holding acquisition of property by the Central Government under Act, 1993, except the site in dispute, valid,
the only area which is now required to dealt with by us in all these cases is that which comprises of the of outer and inner courtyard including disputed structure.
4458. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case since the property in dispute against which now the Court is required to consider whether the plaintiffs are entitled for relief or not is well identified and known to all the parties, there is no ambiguity. Issue No.5 is answered in affirmative i.e. in favour of the plaintiffs. (Vol. 21.pdf) 

Note: This is why I call this is an extraordinary landmark judgement. It spans mahaakaala from the sublime Rigvedic dharma times of 'commonwealth' to the mundane issues of 'title' in nyaaya based on 'private property' concepts. अहम् दधामि द्रविणं of Rashtri sukta of Rigveda where Vaakdevi claims: aham rashtrii samgamanii...

An 8000 page document worthy of careful study in every historical enterprise or research of the narrative of a civilization that spans millennia.

dhanyavaadah.

kalyanaraman
--
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
Dhanyavaad,
Sanatana Dharma Foundation, Dallas, TX.
.

__,_._,___


Friday, October 8, 2010

Ramlla temple-ultimate status

Sir,
As long as Christianity and Islam survive, no idol can survive.

--
Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Re: [notun_bangladesh] An extra-judicial verdict: Retrospective sanction of 1992 demolition on questionable grounds makes mockery of secularism and rule of law in India

My take:
Put some light on Qaba which is our Kameshwar Mahadev Jyotirling. 359 idols in the vicinity were demolished by Ali. It has reference in   Koran 17:81.
Muslims' Islam has divided humanity between Momins and Kafirs and territories between Dar-Ul-Herb and Dar-Ul-Islam. Slay or convert Kafirs into Momins and convert Dar-Ul-Herb into Dar-Ul-Islam is Jihad. (Koran 8:39). Jihad is divine command and sure path to heavenly brothel. 
We, the people of India, have right of private defence u/s 102 of the IPC.
Put some light as to why should we not kill every Muslim and demolish all mosques on the earth?

-- 
Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?
===
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Mohammad Basirul Haq Sinha <mohammad_b_haq@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
 

Welcome to Kashmir Times
 
Online Edition | Editorial

An extra-judicial verdict
Retrospective sanction of 1992 demolition on questionable grounds
makes mockery of secularism and rule of law in India

THE verdict of the
Lucknow bench of
Allahabad high court on
the Ayodhya dispute, delivered
on Thursday, will be remembered
more for its extra-judicial
impurities than as a citable case
of immaculate jurisprudence.
Immediate impact of the pronouncement
without untoward
fallout, amid hyped fears about
its grave consequences, is perhaps
a more significant development
than the judgement itself.
By and large every section of
public, political and religious
opinion responded with commendable
restraint which if sustained
over the next few weeks
could be a really great achievement.
However, that is a million
dollar question, given the past
record and known tendency of
the extremist fringe to exploit
every possible 'opportunity' of
this kind.
The content, context and wisdom
of the puzzling judicial verdict
lend itself to diverse and
contradictory interpretations.
There has been no dearth of
opinions from hailing it as an
act of 'judicial courage' to condemning
it as a 'panchayat raj
decision'. To a layman, both
seem almost equally convincing.
Indeed, the 10, 000 page judgement
written by the three
judges of the high court is so full
of confusing conclusions that
their individual interpretations
become stretchable all too easily.
For instance, the court was
asked to pronounce on the ownership
of the plot of land at
Ayodhya. Instead of answering
the simple question in clear cut
terms, as judicial verdict is supposed
to do, the judgement in
this case is fraught with ominous
implications. On the one
hand it has ousted the claim of
the Sunni Waqf Board but on
the other it upheld it by awarding
one-third share of the disputed
property to the Board.
Judicially, this position is irreconcilable,
as much as it defies
logic. Similarly, the judgement
holds that the birth place of
Lord Ram is exactly under the
central dome of the destroyed 3-
dome structure (Babri Masjid)
but relies on what is patently
questionable inconclusive finding
of the Archaeological Survey
of India. Yet it is this dubious
part of the judgement that tilts
the balance of not only the ownership
dispute but the entire
gamut of its political and ideological
dimensions. The judgement
looks to be an odd mixture
of facts, mythology and principles.
Perhaps the saving grace lies
in that part of the judgement
which by consensus of all the
three judges says that status
quo will prevail at the disputed
site for next three months and
that leave to appeal against the
verdict is instantly granted to
litigants. Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh's statement
rightly emphasised this point
while counselling patience and
restraint. There is no doubt that
the case will land in the lap of
the Supreme Court of India
sooner than later. Obviously,
the judicial process is yet to be
exhausted in the six decade old
dispute. All that can be said at
this moment is that the last
word has not been said in the
case, mercifully. The Allahabad
high court judgement has created
a piquant political situation
for the central government.
It was the Congress government,
of PV Narasimha Rao, in
New Delhi when the Babri
Masjid was demolished in
December 1992, in gross violation
of rule of law, civilised
behaviour and political propriety.
The demolition marked the
culmination of politically-motivated
communal frenzy. Now
when that act has virtually
been 'santified' by the
Allahabad court verdict there is
again a Congress government at
the centre. Deeper analysis of
the judgement delivered on
Thursday brings out a highly
disturbing feature of Indian
polity. It sanctifies lawlessness
propelled by communal frenzy.
Nobody can deny that the ideological
packaging of LK
Advani's Rath Yatra in the
early 1990s that culminated in
wanton destruction of over 400
year old Babri Masjid was antisecular,
anti-constitutional and
it mocked at rule of law. The
court verdict has virtually justified
the 1992 demolition by
declaring, on questionable findings,
that the birth place of
Lord Ram was indeed where the
Hindu's believed it to be and
that the Babri Masjid had been
built over the site of a demolished
temple. The BJP whose
stalwarts are facing criminal
charges in the demolition case
had every reason to exude satisfaction
beyond their expectation.
Given the propensities of the
Sangh Parivar, it is only a question
of time when they launch a
more determined offensive to 'to
recover' 33, 000 sites of 'demolished
temples' across the country.
Ex-post judicial approval of
the demolition at Ayodhya in
1992 is a boost to the campaign
for 'restoring' temples identified
by the Parivar. The politico-ideological
fallout of the Allahabad
high court judgement is going to
pose toughest challenge to the
Congress party and its government.
The minority community's
faith and confidence in the
ruling party's will as well as
capability to defend secularism
and rule of law is now in more
serious doubt. One Congress
government connived in the
demolition of the Babri Masjid
and another one failed to prevent
the dastardly act from
being sanctified with judicial
approval. Muslim minority has
reason to be more fearful after
the verdict, notwithstanding
restrained initial impact of the
judgement. Triumphalism lies
at the root of the Saffron ideology.
And Muslims have always
been at its receiving end.




--
MBHS

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Rainey

Rainey
http://pohitromu.surge8.com/lokxeteb.html
grerrgertrtjrtjrtj

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Gabriel

Gabriel
<a href='http://pohitromu.surge8.com/yagycbnw.html'>yagycbnw</a>
jfekjnef4idf48hf

Covington

Covington
<a href='http://pohitromu.surge8.com/qldfphmn.html'>qldfphmn</a>
jfekjnef4idf48hf

Correa

Correa 4rde3we5ty7hh