Monday, August 2, 2010

Re: Business of education in the name of minority rights-RL Francis-2 August 2010

My take,
Thank you Mr. RL Francis and Mr. Mohan Gupta for valuable informations.

Minority Education 10802



 "National Commission for Minorities Educational Institutions"

High court and apex court judge has to take oath to uphold the Indian Constitution as per Schedule III forms IV and VIII. Governors take oath to defend the Indian Constitution as per Article 159. Governors and Judges, who administer oath to each other, have taken oath to defend and uphold the conservation of the language, script, or culture of the minorities. We, Vedic Panthies, are minority among the minorities of the world. As such, we deserve first priority to run our Gurukul system of education, which was destroyed by Macaulay quoted hereunder,



"I have traveled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominant nation."

Look! In spite of protracted attack, murder, demolition of worship places, rape of women and plunder by Muslims since 712 A. D., Aryans were spiritually, morally and economically rich. Bharat was golden bird until 1835 A. D. No sooner Aryans lost their morals, they lost every thing. Tell me who is more lethal; the culture of Tadka defended by Hamid Ansari or the culture of Putanaa represented by Antonia?

Our Vedic Sanaatan Dharm has long cherished values. If wealth is lost nothing is lost. If health is lost, half is lost. However, if moral is lost every thing is lost. Therefore, no sooner, Macaulay destroyed our Gurukuls, we lost every thing.

There was no thief and beggar in whole Bharat until 1835. There were no scheduled castes. People had high moral and caliber. Now even president Pratibha is financial racketeer and every one is thief. Citizens have been deprived from their property rights. [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31] and every one is beggar. Governors are nominated by Sonia, who is defending public servants u/s 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. 

Christianity and Islam refuse our Vedic Sanaatan Dharm and hell bent to impose their culture of murder, plunder and rape on us. I reject them; because this is my duty to save humanity from the scourges of Christianity, Islam and Democracy. Again, this is our long cherished culture, value and principle. Those, who have relinquished Vedic Sanaatan Dharm, are moving corpses.

That the sorry state of affair is that you do not feel horrified that you have been reduced to sheep of such a blatant criminal cow and man eater Jesuit Sonia and Zimmi of Mujahid Hamid Ansari. Both have divine command {(Bible, Luke 19:27) (Azaan, Namaaz and Koran 2:191 and 21:98)} as well as unfettered fundamental right [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] to slay you, steal your possessions {(Koran, 8:1, 69 and 41) and (Bible Deut. 20:14)} and rape any woman on the earth? (Koran 23:6) and (Bible, Isaiah 13:16). You have been compelled to accept Jehovah and Allah Gods, Bible and Koran religious books, mosques and churches worship places and Azaan call for prayer. (AIR 1985 CALCUTTA HIGH COURT104). For your sustenance, power and pelf, your rulers have no choice than upholding their (Muslims' and Christians') fundamental rights mentioned above. (Article 60 of the Indian Constitution, Article 159 of the Indian Constitution and Schedule III of the Indian Constitution.)  You are celebrating 15th August 1947, viz. the day of rape of your women, hounding you out of your mother land, vivisection of your motherland and plunder of your ancestral properties by secular and peace loving Muslims on the command of their dreaded satan Allah, on the instance of pimp Mountbatten, who delivered his wife Advina to Jawahar Lal Nehru in lieu of cheating Aryans. You are celebrating the doomsday viz. Jan. 26 since 1950, the day on which you lost your right to property, [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31], right of your life, faith, culture and nation. Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution. Have you courage to protest the presence of such violent and murderous rulers in Bharat?

That Judges take oath to uphold the Indian Constitution, which has snatched citizens' right to property, [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31], freedom of faith, (Azaan, Namaaz and Koran 2:191 and 21:98) right of life, {Azaan,  (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39), (Bible, Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5 and Luke 19:27) right of nation, and dignity of women. (Koran 23:6) and (Bible, Isaiah 13:16). The relegation of the above rights have been reinforced with the compilation of the Indian Constitution by the Britons' Congress. Judges are independent for name sake. They are slaves of rulers. Whatever, crime the Rulers wished to commit with citizens, they did through judiciary.

It was the apex court which snatched citizens' right to property. (Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v UOI, AIR 1951 SC 458: 1052 SCR 89;) (Hiralal J. Kania CJ and 4 other JJs. Date decided 5-10-1951). It was the Calcutta High Court, which declared Jehovah and Allah gods and Bible and Koran religious books. It was the apex court, which snatched right of maintenance of Muslim women in Shah Bano case. It was the apex court which granted salaries to Imaams, amounting to Rs. 10,000 crores annually, ignoring Article 27 of the Indian Constitution, in lieu of abusing your faith and Ishwar, through Azaan,  (AIR 1993 SUPREME COURT 2086). It was apex court, which tried Sati case of Roop Kunwar in Rajasthan. Now judiciary legalized intercourse between the persons of same sexes. It is the apex court, which legalized live in relationship. It is the Haryana High Court which permitted marriage between sister and brother. Now would be turn of Virgin mothers. Judiciary would rule that virgin mothers be rewarded by the Governments.

Look! Still today English culture could not dominate. Still we do not revere virgin mothers. Still today our daughters do not get pregnant during their studies. Our Government still yet did not permit Gay and Lesbian marriages. Now, on the instance of Sonia, Delhi High Court has permitted Gay and Lesbian sexual relations.

Freedom to run education system u/A 30 of the Indian Constitution.

What are the teachings of Muslims and Christians?

Secular Allah boasts for being a terrorist {(Koran 8:12) and killer (Koran 8:17)} and permits incest (Koran 33:37-38). Secular Allah claims that he deceives humanity, (Koran 9:3) assassinates humanity, (Koran 9:5) slays humanity, (Koran 8:17) dupes humanity, ambushes humanity, (Koran 9:3) robs humanity, (Koran 8:1) condones rape of women, (Koran 23:6) enslaves women, Children, and even his own worshippers, commits murder, (Koran 8:17) genocide, (Koran 8:39) sadistic tortures, terrorism, warmongering, (Koran 2:216; 8:65 and 67) etc. on the pretext that one does not worship Allah alone. Still Muslims claim that they are Seculars!

Secular Allah's good Muslim becomes Jihadist i.e. crusader of Islam, a man who leaves his home, sacrificing his wealth and life, fighting in Allah's Cause. (Koran, 8:72). That cause is destroying all faiths save Islam. (Koran 8:39). Allah says they (Muslims) will be rewarded with stolen booty (Koran, 8:1, 69 and 41) and women to rape (Koran, 23:6) of the victim/s, if they survive or with a heavenly BROTHEL (Koran, 37:47-49 and 76:19-21) if they die. Bad Muslims, on the other hand, are peaceful. Allah calls them "hypocrites", because they are unwilling to fight. (Koran, 3:167). He even says that peaceful Muslims are "the vilest of creatures" and that hell's hottest fires await them. [Koran 16:70] If you are a peace-loving Muslim, may note, your Allah hates you. You Muslims have no shame that you submit to dreaded incest monger, (Koran 33:37-38) assassin and robber Allah. (Koran, 8:1 and 17). Look! This is secularism. Democrats say, "This is peaceful coexistence and religious tolerance!" Good Muslims are those, who relinquished liberty in lieu of booty and sex.

One, who deposes faith in Christianity, may note that one relinquishes liberty, loses manhood to become sheep, no sooner one accepts Jesus one's saviour. The father of Jesus named Yahweh/Jehovah is scared of wisdom in man. (Bible, Genesis 2:17). This is because Yahweh is Satan. A man with wisdom would understand that the acts of murder, plunder, incest and rape preached by Jehovah/Yahweh are crimes and sins both and would not succumb as such the first condition of Judaism is that one must not have wisdom and must be ready to slay and rob non Jews and rape their women. Yahweh is brain child of Moses. Moses invented Yahweh/Jehovah to enslave the humanity and steel the possessions of the humanity. In lieu of accepting servility of Moses, the followers of Yahweh/Jehovah have been granted three incentives by Moses to conquer the world for the prosperity and propagation of his faith Judaism viz. (1)His followers would ravish women of their choice in front of the eyes of the men of victim women; (Bible, Isaiah 13:16), (2) would usurp the properties of victim and (3) slay the conquered men.

Good Christian pimp Mountbatten delivered his wife to Nehru. Got vivisected Bharat, got killed more than 35 lacs innocent persons, displaced another more than 4 crores Aryans and Muslims from their motherland, got raped women of Aryans. Detained Muslims in Bharat to get Aryans slain.

Muslims and Christians do not feel ashamed that their gods make them corrupt and immoral!

Remember! You are not buying that this is an evil world and that you all are sinners. You are also not buying that as you are not baptized, you will go into Hell and burn forever. Also, you are not buying that if you are baptized you are given a promise that you will go to Heaven of fools, wherefrom Adam was chased away (Bible, Genesis 2:17) and live with the Lord forever, regardless of what you do. You are not buying that because you are baptized all your sins will be forgiven. You believe in logic and moral and Christians believe in faith. 

While Pakistani radical Muslim theorist Syed Abul Ala Maududi declared that "Islam requires the earth - not just a portion, but the whole planet - not because the sovereignty over the earth should be wrested from one Nation or several Nations and vested in one particular Nation, but because the entire mankind should benefit ... from 'Islam' which is the programme of well-being for all humanity, Jesus commands his sheep to slay those, who do not accept Jesus their ruler. Is it liberty?

Maududi insisted that non-Muslims, although free to practice their "false, man-made way," have "absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God's earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines." If they do, "the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life."

Reading Allah's orders out of the Koran's 8th surah, Imaams preach: "O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will kill a thousand Infidels, for they are a people devoid of understanding." That is the math of Jihad. It is being made possible because infidels are ignorant of Islam. In addition, note how, the Koran defines "Infidels". "They are surely Infidels who say Christ, the Messiah is God." (5:72)

Read how Allah recruits suicide bombers: "Those who barter their life in this world for the next should fight in the way of Allah; whether he is killed or victorious, a glorious reward awaits." "Urge the believers to fight…to keep back the might of the Infidels." "Seize them and kill them wherever they are." "Muslims who sit idle are not equal to those who fight in Allah's Cause with their wealth and lives. Allah has exalted  those, who fight for Islam."

Now read the words of the Saudi ruling family's favorite Imaam, al Buraik. He is licensed Imaam , he's atop the pecking order. Prior to a telethon hosted to enrich the families of Palestinian suicide bombers, this esteemed cleric said, "I am against America. She is the root of all evils and wickedness on earth. Muslims, don't take Jews and Christians as allies. Muslim brothers in Palestine, do not have any mercy or compassion on them, their blood, their money, or their flesh. Their women are yours to take, legitimately. Allah made them yours. Why don't you enslave their women? Why don't you wage jihad? Why don't you pillage them?"

Do you suppose the licensed Saudi cleric was corrupting Islam too? Sorry. It's Allah who commands Muslims not to befriend Christians and Jews, for he wants them killed so he can use their bodies to stoke hell's fires. "O believers, do not hold Jews and Christians as your allies. They are allies of one another; and anyone who makes them his friends is one of them." Koran 5:51. "As for those who deny Islam...they shall be the faggots for the Fire of Hell." Koran 2:10. "Allah said, 'A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.'" Koran 8:67. Therefore, Saudi Imaam has correctly interpreted Islam's message. "Allah made the Jews leave their homes by terrorizing them so that you killed some and made many captive. And He made you inherit their lands, their homes, and their wealth. He gave you a country you had not traversed before." Koran 33:26

Do you know? The Islamic warlords, who rule Saudi Arabia were enthroned by the British, by way of reward. The Britons bribed them to fight against their Muslim brethren, the Ottoman Turks, in the World War I.

The official English Koran bears the stamp of the Fahd Foundation. It writes below surah 2:190, "Jihad is holy fighting in Allah's Cause with full force of numbers and weaponry. It is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars. By Jihad, Islam is established, Allah's Word is made superior (which means only Allah has the right to be worshiped), and Islam is propagated. By abandoning Jihad, Islam is destroyed and Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honor is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim. He who tries to escape from this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite."

With the blessings of Jagatguru Swami Shri Amritanand Devtirth of JandK, who is in jail now in Malegaon blast conspiracy, I am Press Secretary of Aryavrt Government. I need persons, who are determined to drive Christianity and Islam out of the face of the world. Come on and join Vedic Panth. Don't say I respect Christianity and Islam.

As long as you would tolerate Christianity and Islam and their protector the predator and pirate Indian Constitution, you would be driven like sheep of Jesus and like Kafir of Allah. You would remain deprived of your freedom of faith, right of life and property. Rise and declare, "We would not tolerate criminal cultures of Christianity and Islam."

I agree with Daniel Webster who said, "There is no nation on earth powerful enough to accomplish our overthrow. Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence. ... I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants... they may be made the dupes of designing men and become the instruments of their own undoing."

One, who worships other gods than Allah, that one must be slain, that one's lands and properties must be looted and that one's women must be raped. (Koran 8:69 and 23:6). These are divine commands as well as secularism. One, who opposes secularism, Azaan and Koran goes to jail u/s 153 or 295 of the Indian Penal Code with the sanction of either President, or Governor or District Collector u/s 196 of the Criminal Procedure Code. I had been in lockups and jail for 42 times since 1993 for opposing Azaan, Koran and Bible. The conservation of Koran and Bible cultures have to be defended by the President of India as well as all the State Governors by oath. [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] and [(Articles 60 and 159 of the Indian Constitution) as well as to be upheld by the judges, (The Indian Constitution as per Schedule III forms IV and VIII) on the pretext of minorities. However, no Imaam was ever punished for inciting violence since 1860 AD.

The perpetrators of Islamic terror and Christianity's Mission are inflamed by violent and racist doctrines. The doctrines are ' Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39) and "But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me." Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27. Both have agenda, and you are ignorant of it. If you do not retaliate, humanity would finish.

Moral values redefined

Creator of universe named Jehovah and Allah, who could have created people with pre-programmed brains of good behaviour and stopped creation of minds dissenting with gods' own commands. Creating people of discerning minds and there after killing their own creatures {(Koran 8:17) and (Bible, Luke 19:27)} questions capability of their being almighty. Belief in such creationism is childish and shows lower stage of evolution of brain. It proves that Prophets were high class scoundrels of their times and their deeds and dogmas are quite questionable. That is the tragedy of faith.

Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site:
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Mohan Gupta <> wrote:

Business of education in the name of minority rights

RL Francis

2 August 2010

Justice Ranganath Misra Commission report has caught the attention of the entire country. It has strengthened the demand of the Church and Christian organizations to provide reservation for Dalit Christians. They are holding rallies and meetings to pressurise the Centre to implement the Misra Commission report.

The question arises whether the Church and these Christian organisations have ever thought of first giving admission to students and recruiting teachers from their own community in missionary-run schools. The fact of the matter is that the percentage of Christian students and teachers in these schools is negligible. They run the schools and educational institutions just to do business and earn profits, instead of doing service to their own community.

Interestingly, all governments at the Centre, irrespective of the political party, have tried to appease the Church and Christian organisations. The policies of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) and Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) have not been very different regarding the Church and Christian organisations.

It may be mentioned that the "National Commission for Minorities Educational Institutions" had recently proclaimed its verdict that the number of students from a minority community is not a valid basis for granting or taking away recognition of a minority institution. The status of a minority institute will remain intact whatever be the number of non-minority community students in the institution. This decision is contrary to an earlier verdict of the apex court in which minority institutions were directed to fill a certain limit of total admissions by minority community students.

The UPA constituted the National Commission for Minorities Educational Institutions (NCMEI) in 2004 for the sake of convenience to minority educational institutions under the stewardship of former judge, Justice M.S.A. Siddiqui. Minority communities have freedom under Article 30 of the Constitution to establish and run their own educational institutions. Muslims, Sikhs and Christians are running a large number of minority educational institutions under the Act.

The basic objective behind giving these special rights under Article 30 of the Constitution was to promote the language, script, culture and religious education of the community. However, Indian Church and Christian Missionaries misused this right to fulfill their own agenda after independence. They often used this right as a tool for expansion. The Church has gained much by granting admissions to children of high profile politicians and bureaucrats in their 5-star convent schools.

Lots of cases against arbitrary decisions have come to the Supreme Court. The Court had said that minority educational institutions will have to take care of students of minority communities to a certain level. These institutions will be free to admit children of non-minority community but in no circumstances can they overlook the interests of students of the minority community. If a minority educational institution is found violating this order, its minority status could be withdrawn. The Court even said that if the State Governments want, they can decide a certain percentage of seats for students of the minority communities for such institutions.

Complaints of Sikh and Muslim students not getting admission in their own institutions are rare. Indeed this problem persists only with institutions run by the Church. The Church has laid a web of educational institution across the country. The influence of the Church can be ascertained from the fact that the Christian community which is merely 2.5 percent of the population has a monopoly over 22 percent of educational institutions – yet even then about 15 percent of Christian children in cities and 40 percent in rural areas are illiterate! Convent schools administered and run by the Church do not give admission to poor Christian children at all.

At a programme organised by the Poor Christian Liberation Movement (PCLM) in the national capital region of Delhi, a Dalit Christian leader said, "The Christian educational institutions are here to serve the rich, instead of the poor Christians. Even in metros like Delhi, the number of Christian students in these institutions is negligible. The special rights entrusted by the Constitution are being used to churn money and for the expansion of the Churches." Had the Church played its role honestly, it would not have to demand inclusion of its followers in the list of Scheduled Caste and notifying of the Ranganath Misra Commission report.

Several complaints of this nature were constantly made to the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions. Keeping this in mind, The Telegraph, Kolkata, on March 7, 2010 published an article quoting Chairman Justice M.S.A. Siddiqui, "The educational institutions run by the Indian Church should have at least 30 percent Christian students and if this is violated such institutions will loose their minority institution status."

Echoing the same view, the Supreme Court had said in its 2005 verdict that the benefit of minority education institutions should necessarily percolate to those community students in the name of whose progress they have been established. The NCMEI Chairman said, "Educational institutions of Sikh and Muslim community are giving maximum benefit to the students of their community. Here, the problem lies with the institutions run by Christians. So the National Commission for Minority Educational Institution has ratified this proposal that those Christian educational institutions that fail to maintain minimum 30 percent Christian students will loose their minority status."

The entire Indian Church establishment openly stood against this order of NCMEI. The Catholic Bishops Conference of India (CBCI), the Commission for Education and Culture, expressed serious disagreement before the Prime Minister and Education Minister against the verdict of the Commission fixing the minimum limit of minority students in church-run institutes. The CBCI said Article 30 (1) of the Constitution gave them the right to run their institutions and there was no percentage fixed to get minority status.

Since then NCMEI began looking for a way out to change its decision, and got an opportunity after a controversy between a Church-run school and the Odisha government broke out. The Odisha government had alleged that the percentage of Christian students in the school was very less and so the minority status of the school should be withdrawn. NCMEI smelt an opportunity to change its earlier decision and in a single stroke stated that no minimum percentage is required to run a minority school!!!

Human Rights activist Joseph Gathia believes that the right to run educational institutions was given keeping certain responsibilities in mind. The aim was to promote the interests of backwards and poorer sections of the community by their own community, so that they could stand with equal footing with relatively well-off communities. It will not be unconstitutional to impose some restrictions in order to stop the misuse of this privilege. Taking legal recourse on denying admissions to minority students falls in the same domain. Joseph Gathia says that if the Indian Church does not want to run these institutions for its own community, for whom does or what does it want to run these institutions? 

Should the decision of NCMEI and the flimsy logic put forward by the Catholic Bishops Conference of India and Commission for Education and Culture before the Prime Minister – that no percentage was fixed in the constitution – be construed as a guarantee to open education institutions in every nook and corner of the country by misusing constitutional provisions for churning money? There are hundreds of convent schools like Saint Columba's, Jesus and Mary, Mater Dei, Saint Thomas which are being run in and around Delhi under minority status. Has the government ever bothered to find out the percentage of the minority community in these educational institutions?

One example will suffice. Saint Thomas school in the national capital region has around 1500 students; the Christian students are less than 50. Similarly, in Khatauli near Delhi, there are hardly any Catholic families but there is a convent school. The question arises - if students and teachers in these schools are not Christian, then for the conservation of which religion, language and culture is the Church availing of minority rights?

Vested interest groups are exploiting loopholes in the constitutional provisions for their own expansion. The objective of the constitutional provision was to promote the legitimate interests of the minority and not to give vested interests the freedom to run commercial educational institutions in the name of minority educational institutions.

The Church and Christian organisations should introspect and evolve a road map for the betterment of poor Christians. Instead of asking the Centre to implement the Report of the National Commission for Religious and Linguistic Minorities (Ranganath Misra Commission), the Church should first ensure adequate quota for students and teachers of its own community in missionary-run schools. Otherwise, its credibility will be further eroded.

The author is national president, Poor Christian Liberation Movement


Anonymous said...

From Sweden.
muslims want to kill Sweden artist so this is what we do.
If muslims kill Sweden artists, is it self defense to kill muslims?
Help to cure muslim children from islam and send this info to there internet HOME page.
"prophet" mohammed is haram.
When mohammed was 50 year old he marry Aisha a 6 year old child when Aisha was 9 year old "prophet" mohammed rape Aisha so he was a fucking pedophile and a slave owner so fuck him.
Girls read quran sura bina 60.
Watch and read mohammed T-shirt art from Sweden at,
Not mine ip nr

AyodhyaPrasad Tripathi said...

Qaba is booty. Mosques are barracks. Koran is guide of terrorism. So why not eradicate Islam?