Christianity and Islam are cults. It is time to wake up and realize that these cults are threat to humankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims and Christians. As long as Muslims and Christians believe in Muhammad and Jesus, they are a threat to others and even to themselves. Secularism and Multiculturalism is bankrupt against Judaism's, Christianity's & Islam's demand for every civilization to submit. {Azaan, (Koran, 2:191-194 and 8:39) and (Bible, Exodus/ Chapter 20 / The Ten Commandments/ Verses 3 and 5 and Luke 19:27)}. The culture of tolerance collapses in the face of the sacred intolerance of dualistic ethics. Intellectuals respond by ignoring the failure. Muslims and Christians must leave their Christianity and Islam, discard their cultures of hate and join the rest of humankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims and non-Christians must separate themselves from them, ban Christianity and Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and Christians and slay those, who plot against humanity and refuse to integrate. Christianity and Islam are incompatible with humanity and morality. These are warring creeds {(Koran 2:216 and 8:65) and (Bible, Matt 10:34 and Luke 12:49)} that use democracy to destroy humanity and to establish itself as a worldwide dictatorship. The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster, is to expose the fallacies of Christianity and Islam and demystify them. Muslims and Christians must be weaned from Christianity and Islam for humanity to live in peace. Aryavrt Government is here to do it. Support us.
Muslims and Jews must thank Vedic culture for their survival. They are alive, because Vedic culture could not be eradicated. No sooner, Vedic culture would be eradicated; Jews and Muslims would be eradicated within short time. This is because of the fact that with all his might the so-called supreme Allah could not supersede Muslims over Christians' population. Even in Science, technology, arms and deception, Muslims are far behind than Christians. 27 Islamic countries could not defeat small Israel. How would they protect themselves from Christians? Now Muslims are scared for the US occupation upon Iraq and Afghanistan. How would they protect their Islamic countries on the face of the commands of Jesus to slay those, who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27). Muslim historians proudly tell us as to how many women were sold in Baghdad market and how many women were raped by Muhammad, after robbing and killing their near and dear. However, no sooner Serbs raped Muslim women and returned pregnant Muslims' women to Muslims and when Israel killed civilians in Lebanon, Muslims cried for violation of human rights. Do non-Muslims have no human rights? The worst threat is to the women of Aryans and those dictator proletariats, who are neither Muslims nor Christians. It goes to reflect another important stupidity of Muslim (Koran 23:6) and Christian (Bible, Isaiah 13:16) women, who are breeding their own enemies as well as enemies of human race. When would you protect citizens' women on the face of the command of Bible to ravish Muslim women before the eyes of Muslims? (Bible, Isaiah 13:16).
--Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com/wary-of-sonia
Christianity and Islam are criminal religions. They are not minorities. Instead we Vedic Panthies are minority among minorities. Protect us to salvage human races.
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture and even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy and get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith and life with dignity?
===
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: "devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com" <devinder.thakur@btopenworld.com>
To: media_monitor5@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 9 August, 2010 18:42:25
Subject: The Lagality of Nuclear Weapons.
The threat of nuclear warThe present debate was triggered by the comments made by one Habib Yousafzai, a dispersed Muslim of Pakistani origin, presently living in Canada where he is not only spearheading a campaign for "Khalistan" on behalf of the Canadian Sikhs, He also used the link of political analyst.and stated that India should hand over the state of J & K to Pakistan if it wanted to avoid the danger of a nuclear war. My reply to him was that the nuclear bomb was not a weapon of war and cannot be used by one nation against another and at best, it was only a deterrent. I further said that any attempt at an illegal "first use" by the country next door would provoke a violent nuclear reaction from India and the destruction thus caused would be to an "unacceptable" level. This prompted me to pursue this subject a bit further for the benefit of Habib Yousafzai and any one else who might be interested in the subject of the use of nuclear bombs.Legal PositionThe International Court of Justice (also known as World Court) rendered an advisory opinion on the current legal status of nuclear weapons threat or use. This was in response to a request from the United Nations General Assembly to pronounce on the following question"Is the threat or use of nuclear weapons in any circumstances permitted under international law".The Court in its advisory capacity , ruled that "the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the principles and rules of international law applicable in armed conflict and in particular the principles and rules of.humanitarian law.... The use of the word generally however suggested that the court did not make an unconditional ruling of total illegality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons under all circumstance. The sub paragraph in the same section of the formal conclusions reads "however in view of the current state of international law, and the elements of fact at its disposal, the court cannot conclude definitively whether the threat or use of nuclear weapons would be lawful or unlawful in an extreme circumstances of self defence in which the very survival of a state would be at stake".Note; Notwithstanding the above mentioned legal position, , the world community should hold a convention which has become necessary especially after the episode of 9/11 in the New York city that the world would be a safer place if no Muslim country should be allowed to have any kind of nuclear weapons arsenal and no Muslims should have his fingers on the nuclear button because of their direct communication link with "Allah", the supreme commander of all Muslim Jihad in the world.Deterrence Against Pakistan"The question that arises here is"What would be "the unacceptable circumstances to the leadership in Pakistan that would deter them from overly hostile acts This question has a certain amount of fluidity depending on the prevailing internal and external situation within Pakistan. However, Pakistan lacks strategic depth that is critical to give it credence under nuclear conditions, has an indifferent economic infrastructure , limited indigenous raw materials to support its domestic needs, singularly vulnerable lines of communications, suspect level of political cohesion in the provinces. Under the circumstances it is not difficult to identify targets which if threatened with assured destruction could stimulate the psyche of the leadership sufficiently to deter them from "first use"` of their arsenal.""The entire range of possible employment policy options and their effect have been analysed in detail by Dr. Rashid Naim, of University.of Illinois.but strictly from the India standpoint he mentions the following* an assured threat to six to ten metropolitan centres irrespective of a pre-emptive strike against India"`.* neutralisation of up to three sets of communication centres which would critically limit war potentials, civilian industrial activities and seriously hamper any damage limitation and recovery plansThe possible targets could be:*"communication centres at Sukkur and Jacobabad simultaneously"* destruction of four hydroelectric and thermal power stations will reduce energy resources from 1583 to 715 million watts (55%) The destruction of the Mangla and Tarbla dams would reduce water storage capacity by 16.6 million acre feet The collateral damage caused by irrigation and water control system would lead to major flooding in Southern Punjab* destruction of railway centres at Hyderabad , Bahawalpur, Dera Ghazi Khan and Gujarat would paralyse surface transportation in Pakistan .* attacks on Karachi and Gwadar would put paid to all sea communication to Pakistan.In view of the level destruction that would be caused to his country, I sincerely hope that our friend Habib Yousafzai would not talk lightly about a nuclear war in order to wrest J & K from IndiaDT__._,_.___MARKETPLACE![Yahoo! Groups]()
.![]()
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment