Again, I feel pity for the Both Muslims and Christians, who are victims of their prophets, who are dead and have left their legacy behind to rulers. These rulers have to establish their kingdom in the globe. Some are telling that this war is for oil. Some are telling that USA is policing the world. But I say, this war is to eradicate Islam and establish kingdom of Jesus for his second coming to rule upon earth. I feel pity for the Muslims who are the slaves of Muhammad and again feel pity for Christians who are sheep of SATAN and GHOST JESUS as per Bible. Nay! Christians have no right of wisdom. (Bible, Genesis 2:17). These economic and religious slave Muslims are going to hell in graves since the advent of Islam. They would remain there till the Day of Judgment. Do they know who their tormentors are? The sheep and the religious and economic slaves of Jesus, who incidentally are their own cousins, are their tormentors. Do they know why? Because of their lust for booty and sex! So long as they believe in criminal Allah, they cannot survive. The reasons for their defeats are manifold. Muslims are less in population and inferior in war technology. Moreover people of their own faith are assisting their enemies. They must switch their faith into Vedic Panth. They have no choice.
Torah, Bible and Sharia cannot be penetrated by reason (its apparent inconsistencies notwithstanding) and the very attempt is forbidden heresy. It's blasphemy and attracts death penalty in Islamic and Christian countries and punishment u/s 153 and 295 of the Indian Penal Code. Every Jew, Christian or Moslem, who is qualified to give a sound opinion on matters of Torah, Bible or Sharia, is entitled to interpret the application of Torah, Sharia or Bible when such interpretation becomes necessary, but where an explicit command of Jehovah, Jesus and Allah or Prophets already exists, no rabbi, Pope, Father, Gideon, Cleric or Mufti, Aalim, Moslem leader or legislature can form an independent judgment. Since Muhammad is the final prophet, there can be no further development in any judicial matters where the Bible, Koran and Sunnah provide guidance. This deeply undermines the possibility of rational civic debate in Moslem Christian nations and accounts for the distinctly inhuman flavor of their legal systems.
The notorious frauds, named prophets, have invented a new way of making the whole humanity their slaves irrespective of faith. These prophets have converted even their own followers, into their slaves for they have made their fabricated gods unapproachable. Those who accept the faith of prophets, become the slaves of prophets as the prophets have become brokers of Jehovah and Allah! Prophets alone can meet their gods. Thus the followers of the prophets are slaves of their prophets. In lieu of providing incentives of booty and sex, the prophets get killed those who do not accept their faiths. Thus the whole world comes under the control of the prophets. However these monopolies of prophets have put the human race at the brink of annihilation like dinosaurs.
This is because if raping women of alien faith is free from blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians before the eyes of the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)? If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed is justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27) If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens' fundamental right to property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits? If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves? Why should we tolerate that Indian Constitution that grants unfettered fundamental right to minorities to slay and rob the people of alien faiths and rape their women? [Article 29(1)]. Governments are duty bound to protect the properties of their citizens. Where is the moral in Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution that snatches properties of the citizens?
I have a schedule caste friend named Pradeep Gautam. Gautam is his Gotra. My maternal family, I mean my Nanihal, belongs to Gautam Mishra of Saryupari clan of Brahmins. How Brahmins allowed Pradeep remain Gautam? Earlier than 2008 AD, there was no Christian and earlier than 1429 AD there was no Muslim. They were converted under persecution in spite of the commands of their scripture to slay the proselyte Christians and Muslims. (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11) and (Koran 4:89). Do these Christians and Muslims know their ancestors or their native culture? Would these Jews, Christians and Muslims, whose ancestors were persecuted by criminal faiths not take revenge from Judaism, Christianity and Islam? Are these Christians and Muslims not abusing their ancestors? How those, who cannot respect their own ancestors, would respect humanity? Can they bring fraternity?
I suggest Christians and Muslims to not to fall prey to Christianity and Islam. Revive your liberty and moral values. Join Vedic Panth.--
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture & even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy & get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith & life with dignity?
Malaysia blocks Iran Nobel winner
Shirin Ebadi (file pic)
Shirin Ebadi is one of Iran's first female judges
A Malaysian university has cancelled a scheduled speech by the Iranian
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi.
Ms Ebadi, an outspoken human rights lawyer, had been due to speak at
the University of Malaya early in November.
Foreign ministry officials admitted that they had advised the
university to withdraw Ms Ebadi's invitation.
Ms Ebadi, who won the peace prize in 2003, has often found herself at
odds with the Iranian government over her human rights work.
Ms Ebadi had been due to deliver the speech entitled Islam and
Cultural Diversity on 3 November.
But an official told the Associated Press news agency that the foreign
ministry had sent a letter "strongly advising" the organisers not to
go ahead with the speech.
"We were told there would be big implications for bilateral
relations," the unnamed official said, adding that Iranian diplomats
were "pushing for Malaysia to call it off".
The university's vice-chancellor, Rafiah Salim, told the French news
agency AFP that the decision was made "out of respect for our Iranian
students, who were not very happy".
The speech was supposed to begin a series of talks in Malaysia and
Thailand over the next few months.
Other speakers include fellow Nobel laureate President Jose-Ramos
Horta of East Timor and American activist Jesse Jackson.
In her capacity as a lawyer, Ms Ebadi has defended many people accused
of political and security crimes in Iran, and campaigned for greater
rights for women and children.
She has faced numerous death threats and hostility in the Iranian
media, and the government banned her Centre for Protecting Human
Rights in 2006.