My take:
Democracy and the Indian Constitution are the real culprits.
Christianity and Islam are cults. It is time to wake up and realize that these cults are threat to humankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims and Christians. As long as Muslims and Christians believe in Muhammad and Jesus, they are a threat to others and even to themselves. Muslims and Christians must leave their Christianity and Islam, discard their cultures of hate and join the rest of humankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims and non-Christians must separate themselves from them, ban Christianity and Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and Christians and slay those, who plot against humanity and refuse to integrate. Christianity and Islam are incompatible with humanity and morality. These are warring creeds {(Koran 2:216 and 8:65) and (Bible, Matt 10:34 and Luke 12:49) that use democracy to destroy humanity and to establish itself as a worldwide dictatorship. The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster, is to expose the fallacies of Christianity and Islam and demystify them. Muslims and Christians must be weaned from Christianity and Islam for humanity to live in peace. When are you going to ban Christianity and Islam?
Yours faithfully,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)
Aryavrt Government
77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082
Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9838577815
Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com
Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
Read my eBook 'Wary of Sonia on Web-site: http://www.aryavrt.com
If you feel that this message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture & even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy & get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith & life with dignity?
===
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Mohan Gupta <mgupta@rogers.com> wrote:
Prof. Vijay Prashad and Hindu Holocaust museumDue to slavery of the last for about 1000 years, slavery is still not in the blood of Hindus and even in bones. Most common Hindus think and act as slaves.
In all Bhaaratiya languages English and Urdu words are adopted while most of the languages have their own proper words. In Hindi films cast is in English and spoken language is mostly Urdu and English. More than 95% commercial people do not write on the labels of their products. Mostly it is in 100 English to show their slavery on the excuse of English is Lingua Franca of Bhaarat.
Coloniser taking advantage of slavery mentality of hindus Christian people wants to convert Bhaarat into Christian country while Muslims want to convert into Islamic country.
F. Gautier want to create a Hindu holocaust Museum to show the atrocities committed on Hindus by Muslims and Christians.
Some secular people not only oppose such Hindu Holocaust Museum, but raise the question of atrocities committed on Muslims and Christian people.
One should ask such worthy people that Muslims and Christians have destroyed many, many cultures and Civilization. Have Hindus destroyed any culture and civilization.
Secular and anti-Hindu people are extremely active people. These secular people do not want to see atrocities committed on Hindus by Muslims and Christians. These secular people do not want to see even what Koran and Bibles says. Since the news came that F. Gautier want to create a Hindu Holocaust Museum, I have got more mails against such Hindu Holocaust Museum and demanding that Holocaust must be created for Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Jains, Buddha and other religions. I wonder who has stopped any body for creating holocaust museums for Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and other religions.
Do such secular people expect that secular Bhaaratiya government provide funds for such Holocaust Museums as Bhaaratiya government and state governments are providing funds to Muslims and Christians by looting Hindu temples? Not only that Bhaaratiya government provides lots of funds for Urdu, Arabic, Turkish languages. These funds are even more than provided for Sanskrit and Hindi and other Bhaaratiya languages.
---------------------
From: Babu SuseelanWhy people tend to forget atrocities committed against them? Why people collude with enemies? Psychiatry says (stockholm Syndrome) when people are oppressed and enslaved for a number of years, they tend to join with the enemies and begin to oppress and harass fellow brothers and sisters. They hid behind a thick wall of denial and ignore their distorted thinking. They deny or misinterpret reality.Subject: Jinnah and Secularism: Crime of Jinnah
India is loaded with experts on secularism claiming special knowledge on every issues facing India. They tend to whitewash evil deeds perpetuated by our enemies. We are left to grope about the darkness, illogic, and "stinking Thinking" of such decepetive secular leaders. Those of us who practice Hindu Dharma must learn to spot the self-defeating logic, and deceptive thinking of such secular leaders and its ramifications on our life, our country and our future.
The intensity and regularity of this type of thinking are most common among our secular political leaders, academicians and media pundits. In normal conversation we generally do not have time to pause and analyze such deceptive statements. Hence, we may be deceived by and accept as reasonable statements that are historically untrue and meaningless. Such deceptive thinking and thought disorder are prevalent among secularists. While their assertion appears logical and it can make perfect sense to someone who suffer from secular addiction. Furthermore, although secular distorted thinking does not necessarily indicate anti-Hindutva, the intensity and regularity of this type of thinking are most common among our secular political leaders, media pundits and spiritual marketers. Sometimes these contradictions can be even more subtle. Their whimsical and capricious statements are nothing patently absurd until we pause to analyze it. The thinking of secularists is so irrational that one may not be able to communicate effectively with bogus secularists. Being confronted with the delusional thinking of a secularists can be a frustrating spectacle.
Secular interpretation and perspectives may look reasonable on the surface. Many people are naturally taken in by secular reasoning. For many phony secularists, such distorted thinking may even appear valid. Such secular addictive deception is not affected by intelligence. People functioning at the highest intellectual levels, bureaucrats, academicians, journalists are vulnerable to such thinking distortions. They do not reach a conclusion based on evidence or the facts of the situation, but just the reverse.
The noxious consequences, the enormous problems, and the risk of our nation's survival-do not always register with them. They may not see why we should be proud of our culture, our nation. How is that secular pundits can so blatantly contradict themselves, yet not able to recognize even if it is pointed out?
We have a long way to go to make changes in such thinking.
Educated and patriotic and intelligent people need to adopt a path of thinking and communicating more effectively.
Sincerely,
Dr. Babu Suseelan------------
From: NathanK <kollengode99@yahoo.com>
Conservative Christian redneck Senator declares Orissa a Christian country !!
What an arrogance for this Conservative Christian redneck Senator to order the Orissa government to conduct business in favor of Christians. They still think they rule the world. There is no mention about Swamis brutal murder by Christian terrorists, which triggered the riots in Orissa,funded from overseasa Christian countries. They never lecture Islamic countries in this fashion & they know what will happen as happened to Korean evangelists who was beheaded in Afghanistan.
BHUBANESWAR: The ghost of last year's anti-Christian riots in Orissa's Kandhmal district, which left over 40 dead and thousands homeless, is back to haunt the state government with a group of American lawmakers seeking action against those involved in the violence.
As many as 21 US lawmakers, led by Republican Trent Franks, have written a letter to chief minister Naveen Patnaik expressing concern over the alleged intimidation of the Christians in the communally-divided region and the possibility of the perpetrators of the violence going scot-free.
"Such attacks on the fundamental freedom of religion threaten not only India's reputation for religious diversity, but also the very stability of India's secular democracy," said a news agency report, quoting the letter sent late last month.
"Given the recent experience with religiously inspired terrorism, we're concerned that if Hindu extremists can act with impunity toward religious minorities in India, these extremists and their ideologies will begin to affect international security as well," it added.
The letter comes after the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) in August put India under its Watch List for the "country's failure to protect the rights of religious minorities".
The letter hasn't gone down well with Hindu organisations. "Who're they to interfere in Orissa's internal problems?"
Bajrang Dal leader Subash Chouhan asked, "How can anyone say that Christians are the victims of violence at a time when bombs and firearms are being seized from Christian rehabilitation camp?"
Hindu Jagaran Sammukhya Orissa chief Ashok Sahu, who unsuccessfully contested the Kandhmal Lok Sabha seat in the recent polls, too, objected to the letter. "On what basis have they written such a misleading letter, if at all they have sent one? It's uncalled for and the US lawmakers have no role to play in Orissa matters," he said.
Even some Christian leaders have also taken exception to the latter. ``The term Hindu extremists in the letter is unfortunate because we've maintained that criminals have no religion and whatever happened in August-September, 2008, was never the act of Hindus,'' said Orissa Minority Front president Swarupananda Patra. ``Blaming Hindus doesn't make minorities happy, as they are aware of Hinduism's secular tenant which probably isn't known to the US lawmakers.''
---------------
Islamic Shariah Law - Legal Apartheid?
Eurabian Safari / Polygamy in Eurabia
http://www.hudsonny.org/2009/08/eurabian-safari.php
by Thomas Landen
Journalist
It is hot in Brussels. Ramadan has begun. The faithful in the predominantly Muslim borough of Molenbeek are not allowed to eat or
drink from sunrise until sunset. Non-Muslim policemen, patrolling the streets of Molenbeek in their sweltering cars, are not allowed to eat
or drink either. As every year during Ramadan, that they have been told by their superior, Philippe Moureaux, the Socialist mayor of
Molenbeek, they have to respect Muslim sensitivities and not to "provoke" Muslims by violating Islamic Ramadan restrictions in public.
In effect, Islamic or Sharia law is already applied - for everyone - in the Muslim areas of Brussels.
Barely two miles from Molenbeek lies Brussels' European district.. One of its huge glass and concrete buildings is the European Parliament
where the elected representatives from the 27 members states of the European Union (EU) convene. The 736 MEPs (Members of the European
Parliament) have just returned from their summer break. They are mostly unaware of life in Molenbeek. Most of them never go to that
> part of the city. It is probably a sensible decision, because Molenbeek is known to be unsafe for non-Muslims. Nevertheless, it is a
shame that Europe's politicians are unaware of day-to-day life just around the corner. It means that most of the 736 MEPs, who make up the
second largest democratically elected assembly in the world (after India), do not know what life really is like in an ever growing
> section of Europe's urban areas. A walking tour of Molenbeek should be compulsory for every MEP.
Some friends in Brussels organize one-hour trips through Molenbeek. They go in an inconspicuous car, driven by a local who knows the
escape routes, and with a bodyguard. Otherwise the risk would be too > great. These trips are called "safaris." Similar "Eurabia Safaris" are
organized in other European cities. One of the highlights - though absolutely not the most dangerous one - of the safari in Rosengaard,
> the Muslim section of the Swedish city of Malmö, is a short stop, to give the visitor the opportunity to take a quick snapshot, in front of
Malmö's "Jihadskörkortsteori" (Jihad Driving School).
>
The Sharia areas of Europe are expanding rapidly across Western Europe. While currently still restricted to what the French officially
call the ZUS (zones urbaines sensibles - sensitive urban areas) these areas are growing fast. Even today, eight million of the sixty million
inhabitants of France already live in one of the country's 751 ZUS.
The month of Ramadan is traditionally the most dangerous time of the year in Europe's sensitive areas. After sunset, the Ramadan ban on
> eating, drinking and engaging in sexual activities expires until the following sunrise. Ramadan is a period of nightly feasts for Muslims.
Young Muslims are extremely touchy. These feasts easily spill over into nightly spasms of mayhem, vandalism, and violence. Europe's
Ramadan riots often go on for days or weeks, during which hundreds of cars, shops and public buildings are set on fire.
>
In Muslim countries, such as Indonesia, the police step up patrols during Ramadan in order to crack down on illegal nightly activities.
In Europe, however, the police have been given orders to adopt an extra-low profile not to "provoke" Muslim populations. In countries
such as Britain, police officers have had to attend "Ramadan awareness" courses. They have even been ordered, "for reasons of
religious sensitivity," to avoid the execution of arrest warrants for Muslims during the month of Ramadan. During Ramadan, Europe is a
tinder box.
The most widely reported Ramadan riots so far, which were even covered by the American press, took place in France in 2005. Since the 2005
riots, the French authorities have asked the media not to report about > waves of violent unrest in the ZUS - a request which the media seem to
> have followed. During the 2005 Ramadan riots, several sociologists suggested that polygamy was one of the reasons for the large-scale
rioting in Muslim communities among youths who lack a father figure.
This theory seemed to have impressed France's political leaders. Gérard Larcher, then France's employment minister and currently the
president of the French Senate, explained to the Financial Times (Nov. 15, 2005) that multiple marriages among immigrants lead to anti-social
> behavior, such as criminal activity. Bernard Accoyer, a leading parliamentarian of France's governing UMP and currently the president
> of the French National Assembly (France's Congress), said that children from large polygamous families have problems integrating into
mainstream society.
As the Financial Times warned, however, at the time, "Mr Larcher's > comments could further fuel the debate and are likely to outrage
Muslim and anti-racism groups." Apparently, the French government was of the same opinion; it did not follow-up the words of Messrs. Larcher
and Accoyer with a clampdown on polygamy. Having multiple wives is illegal under French law, but is allowed under Islamic Sharia law. It
is estimated that 30,000 French Muslims have more than one wife and that more than 250,000 people live in polygamous families.
The tolerance of polygamous Sharia marriages is not restricted to France. In Norway, the Islamic Cultural Center Norway (ICCN), an
immigrant organization subsidized by the Norwegian state, advises Muslims to take several wives because polygamy "is advantageous and
ought to be practised where conditions lend themselves to such practice." In Britain legislators adopt an equally liberal approach
towards polygamy for Muslim men, allowing tax breaks for their second, third and fourth wives. Last February, Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, a
Conservative Peer of Muslim origin, warned that the growing numbers of Muslim men marrying up to four wives in Britain, is becoming a threat
to community cohesion. In the Netherlands, the authorities officially register polygamous marriages by non-Dutch citizens from Morocco,
Egypt, Pakistan and other Muslim countries. The Amsterdam municipal authorities admitted that they have even registered Dutch citizens (of
Islamic origin) with multiple wives. Belgium, too, recognizes >> polygamous Islamic marriages. Only last month, the welfare department
of the city of Antwerp announced that 45 welfare recipients have two > or more spouses.
Polygamous immigrants abuse the social security system by collecting> state benefits for several wives. In France, residence is only granted
to polygamous families if the two wives do not live at the same address, which means that these families claim double social housing,
family allowances and other social benefits.
The recognition of polygamous marriages of Muslims in countries where polygamy used to be illegal - and still is illegal for non-Muslims -
> indicates that Sharia law is already accepted in these countries. They have implicitly accepted a system of "legal apartheid" with different
legal systems for Muslims and non-Muslims. The decision to avoid arresting Muslims during Ramadan "for reasons of religious
> sensitivity," thereby treating Muslims and non-Muslims differently, confirms this existence of a dual legal system. It is difficult to
> see, however, how such a dual legal system can continue to exist on the same territory. Ultimately, one of the legal systems is likely to
prevail. The decision of the Molenbeek mayor that non-Muslim police officers have to respect the Ramadan prescriptions indicates what the
next step will be if Europe's authorities fail to impose the existing laws of the land on Islamic immigrants: the imposition of Sharia law
on everyone, non-Muslims as well as Muslims. While Europe's Muslims hold their Ramadan, this is something worth pondering for Europe's non-Muslims.------------------------Prof. Vijay Prashad and Hindu Holocaust museum
From: S. Kalyanaraman <kalyan97@gmail. com>
Subject: [akandabaratam] Prof. Vijay Prashad and Hindu holocaust museum
A lesson in hindu history from Dr. Vinod Kumar. http://voi.org/ 20090926244/ 27sep2009/ vinodkumar/ column-vinodkuma r/prof.vijaypras hadandhinduholoc austmuseum. html
Mirror: http://sites. google.com/ site/hindunew/ hindu-holocaust
Muslims do think and act. They are indoctrinated at an early age at islamic hate preaching religious schools to have a narrow tunnel vision which is rigid, and dualistic. Islamic thinking divides people into believers and non believers (kafirs). And islam advocates hatred against Kafirs and intend on wiping them out in the name of Allah. Hindus on the other hand are too open minded to accept any illogical, vicious and destructive ideas. Hindus need to learn that mindless universalism, and tolerance of intolerance in the name of tolerance is pathological. Tolerance of intolerant people and their deviant ideas is not a positive virtue. Evil should be subdued or evil will swallow you.
No comments:
Post a Comment