Where is freedom of faith

Where is freedom of faith enshrined in the Indian Constitution?

Conversion is taboo in Christianity and Islam

Extracted from Bible, Deuteronomy Chapter 13 (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11)

False prophets must be slain, and idolatrous cities destroyed.

13:6. If thy brother the son of thy mother, or thy son, or daughter, or thy wife that is in thy bosom, or thy friend, whom thou lovest as thy own soul, would persuade thee secretly, saying: Let us go, and serve strange gods, which thou knowest not, nor thy fathers,
13:7. Of all the nations round about, that are near or afar off, from one end of the earth to the other,
13:8. Consent not to him, hear him not, neither let thy eye spare him to pity and conceal him,
13:9. But thou shalt presently put him to death. Let thy hand be first upon him, and afterwards the hands of all the people.
13:10. With stones shall he be stoned to death: because he would have withdrawn thee from the Lord thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage:
13:11. That all Israel hearing may fear, and may do no more any thing like this.

Conversion and Koran

http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/quran/004.qmt.html

Koran 4:89

YUSUFALI: They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks;-

PICKTHAL: They long that ye should disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level (with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor helper from among them,

SHAKIR: They desire that you should disbelieve as they have disbelieved, so that you might be (all) alike; therefore take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah's way; but if they turn back, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them, and take not from among them a friend or a helper.

A question arises. Why their own divine commands must not be applied against Muslim Imams, Muftis, Maulavies, Aalims, Pope and missionaries, who are converting Aryans? More so, when Jesus snatches wisdom from his followers, reduces his followers to sheep and converts his followers in to assassins. More so, when Muslim Imams are screaming Azaan from the pulpits of mosque, which is insult to our Ishwar.

My disciples' disciple revered Shri Dara Singh alias Ravinder Pal Singh is charged for burning missionary Graham Staines and his two sons. His case is pending in apex court. How he became criminal in view of the above verses of Bible and Graham Staines was not? After all it is judiciary that held Bible and Koran religious books. (Chandmal Chopra v State of West Bengal AIR 1985 CALCUTTA 104; 1986 Cr.L.J. 182).

http://www.crosswalk.com

Missionaries maintain web sites against the Anti conversion bills passed by States, "India Persecution updates". Why must the missionaries be not replied in their own Bible's dogmas? Who would hang these missionaries till death for supporting conversion?

It was not so long ago that the Bible enjoyed a stranglehold similar to that of the Quran over vast populations in the West. The theocracies propped up by the Bible in Europe and America had enacted similar sagas of slaughter and pillage for several centuries. But a sustained Western scholarship showed up the Bible for what it was. “It would be more consistent,” proclaimed Thomas Pain, “that we call it [the Bible] the work of a demon than the word of God.” The spell of Jehovah was broken. The god of the Bible, according to Thomas Jefferson, “is cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust”. The rest is history. Christianity is now seeking a refuge in countries like India where its rout in the West remains unknown.

Tell me, why Muslims, who scream Azaan, "Allah alone can be worshipped ..." be not seized and killed?

In contrast, the apex court Chief Judge, Konakuppakatil Gopinathan Balakrishanan has taken oath to uphold law of the land.

Islamic and Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving humanity. The truth isn’t hidden, nor it is hard to find. Media is scared, clueless, and willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. Good Muslims and Christians would continue to wage Jihad and Mission until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means is petro dollars and Missionary funds and motivation is Koran and Bible. (Koran 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). If we don’t retaliate, they would keep on killing Human races.
Non-violence is imposed upon Aryans only through [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] and Sections 196 and 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Like Nazis rolling into Poland following the “peace process” in 1930s Europe, the perpetrators of Islamic terror and Christianity's Mission are inflamed by violent and racist doctrines. The doctrines are ' Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39) and “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27. Both have agenda, and we are ignorant of it. If we do not retaliate, humanity would finish.
While the Christianity and Islam have stipulated the condition for existence of humanity of being slave of either Jesus or Allah by deceit, Aryans' (who are branded invaders) Vedic culture forbids deceit. Its scriptures do not allow ambush and terrorism. Aryans did propagate their Buddhism around the world, but nowhere had they ruled upon aliens’ territories. They did not demolish worship places and idols of aliens. They did not kill male persons and infants and did not rape women of alien faith. Their scriptures did not permit such crimes. While they are free to wage war against us, we are compelled to obey peace. Look! What Jews, Christians and Muslims did around the world! Jesus is fraud and enemy of Christians as well as Allah is fraud and enemy of Muslims.
Thus, Christianity and Islam corrupts their followers. Sir Edmund Burke put it this way: "All that is necessary for the forces of evil to win in this world is for a few good men to do nothing."
Vedic Panth has no compulsion in faiths, no hell fire and no death penalty. Gita 7:21. If one wishes to survive as well as protect human race, one may switch to Vedic Panth. Choice is yours. Who has seen heaven? Why should you corrupt yourself? Why should you commit crime with human races? Live and let live.

Muslims in India have sought shelter under Sections 153A and 295A of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) for preventing every public discussion of their creed in general and of their prophet in particular. Quite a few publications which examine critically the sayings and doings of the Prophet or other idolized personalities of Islam, have been proscribed under Section 95 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) as a result of pressure exerted by vociferous, very often violent Muslim protests.

Apex court that had taken Zahira case & Bilkis Yakoob case, who would breed enemies of human races, suo motu has to explain...

The same provisions of the laws should be invoked for seeking a ban on their holy books Bible and Koran. If the CJI fails to invoke the laws, he must resign. He cannot be permitted to aid, abet, instigate and harbour Muslims and Christians, who have divine commands and unfettered fundamental Contitutional right of our genocide.

The credit for this turning of tables goes to Chandmal Chopra of Calcutta. It was he, who filed a Writ Petition in the Calcutta High Court on 29 March 1985 stating that publication of the Quran attracts Sections 153A and 295A of the I.P.C. because it “incites violence, disturbs public tranquility, promotes, on ground of religion, feelings of enmity, hatred and ill-will between different religious communities, and insults other religions or religious beliefs of other communities in India”. He also prayed for a rule nisi on the Government of West Bengal “to show cause as to why a writ of mandamus be not issued to it directing it to declare each copy of Quran whether in the original Arabic or in any of the languages as forfeited to the Government” in terms of Section 95 of the Cr.P.C.

Read my blogs:
http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com/2007/06/victims-of-vedic-culture.html

Duty of judiciary, President of India & Governors

As long as Muslims & Christians slay Aryans, nicknamed as Hindus, usurp Aryans properties, kidnap Aryans women & rape them, shout Azaan on loud speakers, demolish Aryans' worship places, assassinate Soldiers, demand Kashmir & Nagaland, Muslims & Christians get peace prizes. In lieu of abusing you, your faith, your Ishwar & your culture & inciting communal hatred and ill will, while judges cannot even take cognizance of the offence committed by Muslim Imams, u/s 153 & 295 IPC, for want of sanction under section 196 CrPC, the Indian government gives Rs 1,000 crores (Rs 10 billion) towards salaries to imams of mosques and Rs 200 crores (Rs 2 billion) as Haj subsidies, in violation of Article 27 of the Indian Constitution. But no such help is available to Brahmin priests & pilgrims. Look! Not only the Brahmins, but all other castes & creeds are suffering in silence today, seeing the minorities abusing the majority under Government aid & abetment.
Section 196 of the CrPC is being used by Governors as arm to protect Muslims & Christians to liquidate Vedic culture & eliminate Aryans. Governments protect Muslims' & Christians' crimes committed under sections 153 & 295 IPC. No court can take cognizance for the crimes committed by Muslims & Christians, no police can register FIR against Muslims & Christians & no one can complain without sanction u/s 196 of CrPC. No sooner, their Koran, Bible & the predator Indian Constitution is quoted, the Governments get horrified. Sanction u/s 196 is immediately granted. Quoting Bible & Koran & the danger these books have posed upon humanity & conspiracy of Governments to eradicate Vedic culture is crime, while shouting Azaan is no crime. Christians are worse than vultures. While vultures eat dead corpses, Christians eat flesh of living son of the man! (Bible John 6:53).

Any one who has seen vultures might have knowledge that perching of a single vulture upon a green tree is more than enough to annihilate the tree. One Columbus reached America and annihilated the entire 100 million Red Indians and their Maya culture. One Muhammad eradicated all the three his host tribes of Medina viz. Banu Qainuka, Banu Nazir and Banu Quraiza. One Max Muller annihilated Aryans’ Veds and one Macaulay annihilated Aryans Gurukul and Sanskrit language.

Are you aware that Humanity invented governments to protect the lands, ladies, lives, liberties and labours of the subjects? For the very purposes, every government of the day has deputed judiciary and police. Every government punishes the guilty. Notorious criminal prophets invented religions and dogmas which allow them to subjugate even their own followers. This is because Allah alone can be worshipped, Mohammad is broker of Allah (Namaz & Koran 2:191 & 21:98) or Jealous Jehovah alone can be worshipped or religion is opium. Thus, these dogmas subjugate one and usurp the belongings of the haves (‘KORAN’, Chapter 8 (The Spoils of War) Verse 1 & 41) and rape alien women of their choice (Bible, Isaiah 13:15&16) (See Koran, 4:24; 23:6 and; 33:50 & 70:30) and remain scot-free. No sooner, one accepts Islam, Judaism, Christianity, and Socialism, the criminal activities of murder, plunder and rape of women ceased to be considered crimes instead these crimes turn into the source of sustenance and heaven after death for these criminal democrats, Communists, Muslims, and Christians. However, in contrast there is Vedic Sanskriti. It grants freedom of worship of god of one’s choice. (Gita 7:21). Supports one's right to property. (Manusmriti 8:308).Muslims do not hide their goal. In fact, Union of India wishes to eradicate us.

Below are the proofs:-

“Islam must rule the world and until Islam does rule the world we will continue to sacrifice our lives, “Al-Badr spokesman Mustaq Aksari, - CNN September 19, 2001 headlines today!"

If the things I'm doing is considered a crime, then let history be a witness that I am a criminal. Hostility toward America is a religious duty and we hope to be rewarded by God." Osama Bin Laden.

The definition of Muslim given by Dr Rafiq Zakaria, an authority on Islam:“A Muslim is one who declares publicly: ‘There is no God but God and Muhammad is His Prophet.’ He must also accept that Muhammad is the last of God’s prophets on this earth..... A Muslim must also accept the Quran as the word of God, immutable and unalterable; it contains guidelines which a Muslim must follow.” (Rafiq Zakaria, “The Struggle within Islam” Penguin Books, 1988, pp.302).

And these criminals are seculars! These criminals, who vivisected Bharat, still are seculars!! These criminals are demanding Kashmir, still these criminals are seculars!!! These criminals are shouting Azan & reciting Namaz that Allah alone can be worshipped still, these criminal Muslims are seculars!!!!Old or new Pratibha has looted banks, cheated poor depositors of her own cooperative bank, looted Sugar mill assets, she saved her murderer brother & saving her husband. Should we accept such criminal as President?One, who votes her is enemy of human race.

-- Yours faithfully, Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary) Aryavrt Government, 77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082 Phone: (+91) 9868324025Email: aryavrt39@gmail.com
Blog: http://aaryavrt.blogspot.com/

If you feel that the above message be telecasted, donate us. Rush your contribution in the account of Manav Raksha Sangh Account No. 016001020168 ICICI Bank Ltd. Else keep ready for your doom. Remember! Whoever you are, you won't be able to save your properties, women, motherland, Vedic culture & even your infants. Choice is yours, whether you stick to dreaded usurper Democracy & get eradicated or survive with your rights upon your property, freedom of faith & life with dignity?
Apt

Abdullah Bukhari - NGO moves HC to prosecute

NGO moves HC to prosecute Bukhari
NEW DELHI, July 25 (PTI) — A petition seeking registration of a case against Jama Masjid Shahi Imam Abdullah Bukhari for allegedly declaring himself as an ISI agent at a public meeting, promoting disharmony and waging a war against the country was today moved before the Delhi High Court.
The petition by the Society for Securing Justice (SSJ), an NGO sought the registration of a case under Sections 121 (waging or attempting to wage war against the country), 124 (sedition), 153 (provocation for causing riots) and 153-A (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion) against Imam Bukhari for allegedly making a provocative speech at a rally here on April 21.
SSJ’s counsel Arun K. Srivastava told a Division Bench, comprising Mr Justice Usha Mehra and Mr Justice S.N.Kapoor, that the Imam in his speech had asserted that he would go to Ayodhya to lay the foundation of Babri Masjid and had allegedly attacked the policy of secularism enshrined in the Constitution.
Apt

Was Abdullah Bukhari ever charge-sheeted

“Shahi Imam to be charge-sheeted”
New Delhi, February 16Charge sheet against former Shahi Imam of Jama Masjid Syed Abdullah Bukhari in a sedition case for allegedly making anti-national speech will be filed soon as investigation has been completed, the Delhi High Court was informed today.
Delhi Government counsel Mukta Gupta told a bench headed by Justice Usha Mehra that opinion of Additional Solicitor General (ASG) K.K. Sud had already been obtained in this regard after the police completed the probe.
Mr Sud was also present in the court during the hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking investigation into the sedition cases against Abdullah Bukhari and his son and present Imam Ahmed Bukhari for their alleged anti-national speeches last year. The Bench also comprising Mr Justice K. Ramamoorthy disposed of the PIL filed by an NGO, Society for Securing Justice after the statement of the government counsel.
The government counsel on previous dates of hearing had stated that a case under Section 124-A (sedition) had been registered against Abdullah Bukhari with the Kamla Market police station for his alleged anti-national speech in Ram Leela grounds on April 21 last year.
Similarly an FIR under the same section was registered against Ahmed Bukhari with the Jama Masjid Police Station, the government counsel had said.
The PIL alleged that Abdullah Bukhari in his speech had declared himself as an ISI agent and dared the government to arrest him.
The police had registered the cases following filing of the PIL, which alleged that Abdullah Bukhari was promoting disharmony in the society and attempted to instigate a section to wage war against the country.
The petitioner had sought registration of a case under Section 121 (waging or attempting to wage war against the country), Section 124 (sedition), Section 153 (provocation for causing riots) and Section 153-a (promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion) against Abdullah Bukhari.
Society alleged that the senior Imam in his speech had attacked the policy of secularism and asserted that he would go to Ayodhya to lay the foundation of Babri Masjid.
Bukhari in his recent interview to a website again had “proclaimed” himself as an ISI agent and dared the government to arrest him, Srivastava alleged. PTI
Apt

Abdullah Bukhari for Nuke

http://www.hvk.org/articles/1202/37.html
Imam Bukhari: “Islamic countries have to acquire nuclear weapons”
Author: Publication: Israel Defense Forces Date: December 2, 2002 URL: http://www.idf.il/newsite/english/1202-4.stm
The Iranian news agency, IRNA, reported that the Shahi Imam Syed Abdullah Bukhari had addressed Muslims in Delhi's (India) congregational mosque on Friday November 29, 2002, the last Friday of the Muslims holy month of Ramadan, known as international Quds day. In his sermon, Imam Bukhari said "The US, the Zionist regime [Israel], and the United Kingdom will be defeated and expelled to hell and the liberation of Palestine is as certain as the shining of the sun in the sky at midday".
Bukhari called on all Muslim countries to "be united to challenge the unholy alliance of the US and certain other Western powers against Islam". He also urged Islamic countries to acquire nuclear weapons to "become equal in power with their sworn enemies [US, UK, and Israel]", adding "We will face US and Zionist aggression and will pave the way for the liberation of first Qibla [first direction of Muslim prayer]. Believers will never be defeated or scared".
Commenting on the September 11th terrorist attacks in New York, Bukhari said that the US and other Western countries had "themselves launched terrorist movements throughout the Islamic world". He emphasized that Islam was in danger of "the satanic aspirations of the US and those Western countries that act the same as the US".
Bukhari is known to have, in the past, made pro-Taliban and pro-Osama Bin Laden statements. In his sermon, Bukhari also commented that "Indian Muslims have the same faith as the Palestinians in facing the enemies of Islam [ie. Hindus]".
Iranian media is state controlled and therefore IRNA's decision to report the Imam's sermon shows the Iranian regime's support of terror against Israel, America and Britain.

PMO Scuttles Arrest of Abdullah Bukhari

PMO Scuttles Arrest of Bukhari
A. B. Masoud
New Delhi: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and the Union Home Ministry which were locking horns on the issue of directing Delhi Police to arrest the former 'Shahi' Imam Syed Abdullah Bukhari of Delhi's historic Jama Masjid for over a month, have now come to terms and decided to keep the matter in abeyance. Delhi Police had sought permission to detain Imam for his alleged provocative remarks during a rally here last April. The Imam recently abdicated the pulpit in favour of his son Syed Ahmed Bukhari.
According to informed sources, Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee personally came to the rescue of the Imam recently and prevented the Union Home Ministry from giving its nod fearing that the arrest of Bukhari would trigger communal clashes in the walled city. It is to be noted that Delhi Police that functions directly under the Central government had sought permission from the Union Home Ministry to arrest and prosecute the high-profile Imam.
Taking cognizance of Shahi Imam's speech at the 'Mazhab Bachau Rally' at Ramlila ground in Delhi. Delhi Police had filed a case against him under the charges of treason and sedition. In his alleged inflammatory speech, Bukhari had lambasted the official agencies for branding Indian Muslims as ISI agents. He declared at the rally that he was the biggest ISI agent and dared the government to arrest him.
Delhi Police also wanted to teach Imam a lesson seeking permission to book him in another case of treason for his remarks on Jammu and Kashmir. In an interview to a local Urdu daily, Imam had termed the Chattisingpura Sikh massacre on the eve of American President Bill Clinton's visit, as the handiwork of official agencies hatched at the behest of the Prime Minister. He went on further to say that the massacre was aimed to tarnish the image of Muslims and Islam in the eyes of visiting dignitary and to create chasm between Sikhs and Muslims.
Thereafter, Union Home Ministry officials held several meetings with Delhi police officials to discuss the repercussions of Imam's arrest. Following the high-profile drama enacted in Mumbai recently leading Shiv Sena supremo Bal Thackeray to appear in the court, Union Home Minister L. K. Advani is believed to have told his officials that there was need to show Imam his right place. Sources said Advani was particular to enact part-II of Thackeray drama in Delhi and creating an ellusion that nobody was above law.
But, the PMO swung into action soon and held back Advani's proposal. One argument stemmed out of the PMO was that by arresting high-profile Imam who is in twilight of his life and was soon to abdicate his throne would provide grist to the mill of opponents longing to label the government as of Hindu zealots. Already there had been attacks against the government for being too soft to Hindu extremists. The Home Ministry had to finally give in to the PMO's argument.
Furthermore, according to legal experts, the case against the Imam was full of holes and could not stand for trial in the court of law for a minute. They say that Bukhari pronounced the controversial remarks in the context of a particular situation.
It is also said that Imam Bukhari had even himself contacted the Prime Minister through an emissary to thwart his arrest. Imam is facing a dozen cases in different courts across the country. Whenever, any of these courts in past issued arrest warrants against him, Delhi Police complied with the unusual reply that "Imam is presently out of Delhi."
(ends)
Apt

Fresh summons to Abdullah Bukhari Shahi Imam

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:06:30 +0530 =============================================================

Source: The Hindu
(http://www.hinduonnet.com//2000/08/06/stories/1406218a.htm)
Fresh summons to Shahi Imam
By Our Staff Reporter
NEW DELHI, AUG. 5. A Delhi court today issued fresh summons to Syed Abdullah Bukhari, the Shahi Imam of the historic Jama Masjid here, who is an accused in a four-year-old case of unauthorised construction outside the mosque. The Metropolitan Magistrate (MM), Mr. M.S. Rohilla, of Tis Hazari courts issued fresh summons to the Imam after the Jama Masjid police returned unserved the earlier summons issued to him in May. The MM directed Abdullah Bukhari to appear before the court on November 4. The allegation against Syed Abdulla Bukhari is that he got constructed a ``Wazu Khana'' (holy pond) on a Delhi Development Authority (DDA) land marked as green area outside the mosque. Though the DDA later demolished the structure, it did not withdraw the prosecution proceeding against the Shahi Imam. Though, with the timely intervention by the authorities and probably under the court orders the construction was demolished, it would not amount to an end of the matter as Section 11 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act contemplates for a penal offence, the MM said. After investigation, the Jama Masjid police had urged the court to close the case as untraced submitting that nobody was ready to stand witness against him. But the MM rejected the closure report and ordered issuance of summons under Section 11 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act. The MM said that the offence, punishable under Section 11 of the Act, was not one for which any direct evidence might be required. The offence being of a technical nature may be proved by circumstances of various aspects, he said. ``I do not accept the recommendation of the final report to send the case untraced. Instead, I take cognisance of the offence under Section 11 of the Act and direct Syed Abdulla Bukhari, Shahi Imam of the Jama Masjid, to appear before the court as an accused in this case,'' the MM said. However, he clarified that it would be too premature to go deep into the matter and find out what legally acceptable evidence had been collected or whether the evidence collected so far would be sufficient to be admitted or would warrant conviction. ``Suffice it to say that the material on record does not suggest that no case is made out against the named offender," the MM said. Referring to the final report for closing the case, the MM said that it might be noted with significance that the Investigating Officer in his report said that nobody was found who could have spoken against the Shahi Imam and, therefore, the case was not made out. ``Having considered the final report as well as the other materials on record, I find that the request made by the SHO to send the case untraced cannot be acceded to,'' the MM said.
Copyright: 1995 - 2006
The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the consent of The Hindu
===
Apt

Ahmed Bukhari pontiff

NEWSPAPER CLIPPINGS The Pioneer : March 14, 2003
Is the 'secular' party over?
Balbir K. Punj
A youthful Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, writing in his Urdu journal Al Hilal, had advised Muslims in 1913 not to join any political party-for Islam itself was the party of Allah and its name Hizbullah. Down the centuries, Muslims instead of joining others' parties, he observed, had prepared for their own. Ninety years afterwards, the same spirit manifested itself through the words of the Shahi Imam of Delhi's Jama Masjid.
The pontiff Ahmed Bukhari addressing the 27th General session of Jamait Ulema e-Hind (JUeH) at the Ramlila Grounds on March 9, 2003, said: "Muslims need their own political party for political empowerment." He said this in presence of a few illustrious 'secularists' who had come to the convention, perhaps hopeful as ever for Muslims votes. They included the Congress's Arjun Singh, the Lok Janashakti's Ram Vilas Paswan, the BSP's Arif Mohammed Khan and novice Dalit leader Udit Raj of the Justice Party. But all of them came under fire, as Imam Bukhari (Junior) dismissed their 'secular' credentials as phony. Ms Sonia Gandhi's message-"People have become emotional because the country's situation is like that ... India will always remain a secular country"-failed to mollify him. In a feverish pitch, he accused the Congress of the 1984 anti-Sikh riots and the 1989 shilanyas episode at Ayodhya.
It will not be long before we discover whether JUeH President Maulana Madani's resolution of launching a Muslim party within three months will become a reality or not. If it does, its success may be dependent on several factors. It can become a peripheral phenomenon like GM Banatwala's Muslim League, or wield influence disproportionate to electoral strength like the Leftists, or it might be a blitzkrieg like MA Jinnah's Muslim League.
Ahmed Bukhari reportedly has been planning to float a new party for last few years, presumably since he took over the mantle from his father Abdullah Bukhari, who was once said to have proudly called himself "an ISI agent". As a "true Muslim", he is honest about not being a "secularist". In sharp contrast to Imam of Fatehpuri Masjid Mufti Mukarram Ahmed, he had supported the Taliban's demolition of the Bamiyan Buddhas. Referring to Gujarat, he had termed the Bombay serial blasts a reaction to post-Babri riots. This shows his, albeit twisted, frankness.
This mettle is sadly lacking in the supine 'secularists', who queue up the steps of the Jama Masjid before every election to pay obeisance to the Imam. In the institution of the Shahi Imam, the dividing line between politics and religion blurs a la the Islamic Caliph. The pre-electoral custom of 'secular' parties soliciting Muslim votes through the Imam is a sad paradox. Can a pontiff exhort his folks to vote for a particular party en masse? How come this practice is resorted to by 'secularists' who advocate a clinical separation between politics and religion? Is it not funny beards, skullcaps and burqas have become the mascots of secularism?
The Shahi Imam realises 'secularists' need Muslims rather than vice versa. He must be revelling in the pleasure of blasting this spineless Hindu ilk. No doubt he has shown his "Islamic guts". Yet even after being humiliated, the 'secularists' would return to his doorstep for cheap electoral benefits. The nexus of the Imam and the 'secularists' has transformed Muslims into 'votebanks'. The pressing ills of Muslim society-poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, lack of sanitation, reproductive health, polygamy-have never been of any consequence to them. Concerns like environment, population and pollution are always kept outside the 'secular' discourse. What is projected as their crying needs are madrasas, promotion of Urdu, personal law etc.
The idea of a Muslim political party doesn't astonish me per se. Yet burdened with the collective memory of the subcontinental division, its prospect might appear catastrophic. Ironically, it is the natural outcome of the skewed version of secularism pursued in India. It has neither addressed the substantial problems of Muslims nor uncluttered their medieval mindset. Mahatma Gandhi introduced this secular conundrum in the Congress under the name of 'Hindu-Muslim unity'. He zealously involved himself in the Khilafat Movement in 1919 to pressure the British to restore the institution of Khilafat abolished by Kemal Ataturk in far-off Turkey.
Ataturk, a true secularist, had brought about the finest revolution in the Islamic world by building modern Turkey, arguably the sole surviving 'secular' Muslim country. Hence, was Gandhi's action of involving himself with Ali brothers not antithetical to secularism? His involvement with the Khilafat Movement (October 1919) predates his launching of the Non-Cooperation Movement (September 1920) by almost a year. In fact, non-cooperation with the British was originally devised as an instrument by the Khilafat Committee to redress Khilafat wrongs, and not attainment of Swaraj.
But the Mopla rebellion in Malabar, in which large number of Hindus were butchered, raped and maimed by fanatical Muslim mobs, proved the futility of Gandhi's endeavour. The end of the ill-conceived Khilafat Movement and the Non-Cooperation Move-ment widened, like nothing else did, the chasm between Hindus aspiring for Swaraj and Muslims seeking pan-Islamism.
Gandhi, with his 'secularism', could not attract more than four per cent of Muslims, the overwhelming majority of whom rallied round Jinnah with his single-point agenda of partitioning India. So the Congress's 'secularism'-a euphemism for Muslim appeasement- could not satisfy the community enough. Even though the community barely produced any freedom fighters, it felt the need to revive its own party, the Muslim League (originally founded in 1906 in Dhaka much before the ABHM in 1915). So need the 'secularists' be shocked if their 'secularism' has been found inadequate by a Shahi Imam?
The Muslim League's success was as much due to politics as to geopolitics. Muslim majority provinces were concentrated on the western and eastern peripheries of British India. This made the demarcation of Pakistan viable. The liberation of Bangladesh and secessionist insurgencies in Kashmir and India's Northeast have much to do with geography. In Independent India, though 'secular' appeasement of Muslims continued, Muslim politics bowed out for lack of legitimacy. Muslim leaders were shrewd enough to understand that any attempt to launch an independent Muslim party would go against the mood of the Hindu majority, reeling under the bitter memories of Partition. Otherwise, in West Bengal or Assam, they have enough strength to form a Muslim party and demand a plebiscite. My reading is that this is only a matter of time, if the current brand of 'secularism' continues. Geography will be a favouring factor.
What are the factors that facilitate the formation of a Muslim party? The answer is demography, geography, and Islamic fervour. Muslims do not believe Government Census figures putting their population share at merely 12 per cent in India. Former Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court and former Chairman of West Bengal Minority Commission KM Yusuf has put it around 25 per cent. Muslim presence is notably high in a northern border belt that starts from UP's Bahraich district and moves through Gonda, Basti, Gorakhpur and Deoria district of the State, to Champaran, Muzzaffarapur, Darbhan-ga, Saharsa and Purnea, to West Bengal's West Dinajpur, Maldah, Birbhum and Murshidabad districts, to Assam's Goalpara, Kamrup, Darrang, and Nagaon districts. That makes a lot of votes.
Now, since it is not Hindutva forces but the Shahi Imam who has debunked the 'secularists' (including Ms Sonia Gandhi), the latter need to learn a few lessons. Are we tottering on the verge of another communal showdown? Bukhari himself has pointed out that the responsibility lies with the 'secularists', and his words must be credible for the 'secular' bandwagon. After all, did they not create a Franken-stein's monster out of the Shah Bano case?

Ahmed Bukhari case

Ahmed Bukhari case

http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2005/02/imam-and-shankaracharya-not-rule-of.html

IntelliBriefs

Intelli-Briefs bring you Intelligence briefs on Geopolitics , Security and Intelligence from around the world . We gather information and insights from multiple sources and present you in a digestible format to quench your thirst for right perspective, with right information at right time at right place . We encourage people to contact us with any relevant information that other news media organizations don't cover.

Contact :intellibriefs@gmail.com

February 08, 2005

Imam and Shankaracharya : Not the Rule of Law

Differing measures in cases against Imam and Shankeracharya-

D.P. Sinha I.A.S. Retd

In the context of the case filed by Tamil Nadu Govt. against Jayendra Saraswati, the Shankarcharya of Kanchi, the case filed by Govt. of NCT, Delhi against Ahmed Bukhari, Naib Imam of Jama Masjid of Delhi is of relevance. A case against Ahmed Bukhari was filed by Delhi Police in the court of Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi without the arrest of the accused u/s 124-A, IPC in May 1993, on the basis of FIR No. 98/93 dated 14.05.93. The allegations were that the accused on22.01.93 had incited the Muslim congregation, that had collected at Jama Masjid for 'Namaz', against the Govt. to boycott the Republic Day celebrations. The court summoned the accused on 16.10.93 for appearance in the court on 06.01.94. On 06.01.94 summons were received back unserved. So fresh summons were issued for 27.05.94. On 17.05.94 the counsel for the accused moved an application seeking exemption from attendance in the court, which was granted. And the case was adjourned to 31.01.95. Even after seven months accused did not turn up, so bailable warrant was issued on 31.01.95 and it was directed that it be served throughSHO. for 07.02.95.The S.H.O. did not serve the warrant as directed. The accused also did not appear in the court on 07.02.95. The court therefore ordered that non-bailable warrant be issued against the accused for 01.06.95. On 01.06.95 non-bailable warrant was received back unserved. So the Magistrate ordered that non-bailable warrant may again be issued for 19.08.95, to be served through DCP Shri P.N. Agarwal personally. But even the DCP failed to comply with the order of the Court. He again directed the DCP to get the NBW served on the accused for 01.11.95 but it was received back unserved with the police report that the accused was not available at his address. The Magistrate did not give up. He again ordered the D.C.P. Shri P.N.Agarwal to get the NBW served personally for 02.01.96. Still the court orders were not complied with and the NBW was returned to the court with the remarks that the accused was not available on the address. The Magistrate gave up on the DCP and reverted back to SHO. He directed him to get the NBW served on the accused personally for 29.02.96. By now police had successfully thwarted the orders of the Metropolitan Magistrate to ensure the presence of the accused in the court for more then two years. It is to be noted that the Magistrate has been very accommodative to the prosecution by giving adjournments from three to seven months, and by not drawing contempt proceedings against the S.H.O. and DCP Shri P.N. Agarwal, who had disobeyed the court orders with impunity and not served the warrants on the accused personally in spite the specific orders of the court in this regard. But the patience of the Magistrate gave way at long last. By his order of 29th Feb., 96 he observed, "From the entire conduct of police it makes me think that why not a separate executing agency be there under the direct control of the judiciary. The judicial commands are often flouted and thwarted by the prosecuting agency for the reasons best known to them. It frustrates the judicial orders and commands. The helplessness of the judiciary is visible form the conduct of the police which shows that judicial officer is at the mercy of the prosecuting agency and it shows that rule of jungle prevails in the police department and not the rule of law". The aforesaid order does reflect exasperation of the Magistrate with the system. At last he gathered courage to issue a show case notice to the SHO that why he should not be proceeded against u/s 60/122 D.P.Act. He also directed the Police Commissioner Nikhil Kumar to executethe non-bailable warrant against the accused within seven days.

The Criminal Writ Petition No. 138/96

The accused Ahmed Bukhari filed writ-petition No. 138/96 against the order of M.M. dated 29.02.96, for quashing the FIR against him and the aforesaid order of M.M. The Division Bench of the High Court comprising of the Chief Justice and Dr. Justice M.K. Sharma by their order of 06.03.96 admitted the petition and passed an interim order staying the execution of non-bailable warrant and further proceedings in the case against the accused Bukhari pending in the court of M.M. Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma.

Move to withdraw the case by NCT. Govt.

While the above on Writ Petition was pending in the High Court, Govt of NCT decided to withdraw the case against the accused on the ground that it would be 'in the interest of justice and promote public peace and harmony amongst different sect of the society'. In effect the NCT Govt. upheld the view that if the supporters of a person accused of most heinous crimes are such that they may create large-scale disturbance and communal riots leading to arson. loot, murder and rape, the case against him should be withdrawn in the larger interest of public peace and communal harmony. Accordingly, Asstt. Public Prosecuter filed the application u/s 321 Cr.P.C. in the court of M.M. Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, seeking to withdraw the above case.

Objection against withdrawal of the case

At this stage one Shyam Lal through his Advocate N.K. Gupta filed an application in the court of M.M. Shri V.K. Sharma on 02.01.97 objecting to the withdrawal of the case by Govt. of NCT. He submitted that he lived within the jurisdiction of Jama Masjid Police Station, where the inflammatory speech of the accused has created terror and as such he is an aggrieved party. He along with other residents of the area stoutly opposed the withdrawal of the case. Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, M.M. vide his detailed fourteen paged order dated 14.01.95 rejected the request of the prosecution (NCT Govt.) to withdrawal the case. He upheld the objection of the residents of the area against the withdraw of the case. He also cited profusely the case law and rulings of the Supreme Court in support of his order. The Magistrate observed that "As per the allegation of the prosecution accused has made an attempt to overthrew the government established by law. No individual can be allowed to challenge the very existence of the state. No administration of justice would be served by withdrawing the case against him, without any material placed before the court and where court exercises its judicial function".The M.M. also cited Subhash Chander vs State (1980 SCR page - 44) in which Justice Krishna Aiyer had held that "the even course of criminal justice cannot be thwarted by the Executive, however high the accused, however sure the government feels a case is false, however unpalatable the continuance of the prosecution to the powers that be, who wish to scuttle the course of justice because of hubris of action, or other noble or ignoble consideration. Once the prosecution is launched, its relentless course cannot be halted except on consideration germane to justice". The prosecution (NCT Govt.) had sought to withdraw the case against accused Abdulla Bukhari on the ground that it would be 'in the interest of justice and promote public peace and harmony amongst the different sects of the society'. It was not considered an adequate reason to permit the withdrawal of the case and MM Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma rejected it vide his order of 14.01.97. He observed: "As per the allegation of the prosecution the accused has made an attempt to overthrow govt. established by law. He has challenged the sovereignty of the State. No individual can be allowed to challenge the very existence of the State, No administration of justice would be served by withdrawing the case against him without any objective material placed before the court and where court exercises its judicial direction." He further observed that "In the absence of any description from the prosecution, I am a loss to understand that what are the considerations or compulsions before the state that the present case is being withdrawn from the proscription". He dismissed the plea of the prosecution to withdraw the case.

The Revision Petition

The NCT Govt. filed revision petition No. 170 of 1997 in Delhi High Court against the aforesaid order of Metropolitan Magistrate. The major thrust of the petition was "it would be extremely deterrent to the social fabric of the society and the religious harmony prevailing in the capital. In fact, the continuance of the prosecution may arouse extreme feelings of bitterness, violence and disturbance in the prevalent peaceful atmosphere in the country". A careful reading of the aforesaid petition would show that the prosecution (read government of the day) apprehended that if accused Syed Ahmed Bukhari was arrested and case is continued against him, his volatile supporters will plunge the country into violent conflagration, precipitating Hindu-Muslim riots resulting in loss of human life and property. The Govt was frightened and terrorized and therefore wanted to withdraw the case to prevent such a possibility. The NCT Govt. in its revision petition also sought to undermine gravity of the offence u/s 124-A, I.P.C. and submitted that the speech could have been delivered as a natural reaction to demolition of Babri Mosque. It is interesting to note the volte-face of the NCT Govt. The same government which had slapped the case against the accused of a grave offence u/s 124-A, IPC was now dragging feet, and wanted the case to be withdrawn. The Revision Petition came up for hearing Justice J.K. Mehra who in his judgment dated mentioned that "Since the prosecution appears to have emanated form certain allegedly inflammatory statements attributed to the accused, I considered it appropriate to call the respondent accused and to ascertain his stand in the presence of his counsel as well as State Counsel. The said respondent-accused stated before the court that 'he accepted the validity of the Constitution of India and the Rule of Law established in this country and categorically stated that he did not challenge the constitution or Rule of Law established in the country and that he is governed by the same. He accepted that India is his country and he is one of the citizens of India. He stated that he had intended to criticize certain policies being pursued by the then Govt. of India. In the light of this discussion and further subsequent to the alleged incident there have been no complaints against the behavior of the accused, trial court should have exercised its discretion in favour of allowing the application".In the concluding para of his judgment Justice J.K. Mehra observed: that 'keeping the fact that the present application was filed without any malafide and with the bonafide intention of securing peace, harmony and public order in the society, I consider that the trial court has erred in declining the application for withdrawal of application.... the application of the state for dropping the prosecution is allowed and the respondent accused is discharged-' Suming up Section 124-A, IPC is a cognizable offence, under which police usually arrests the accused person, as soon as a FIR is lodged. But no such arrest was made by Jama Masjid Police Station of Delhi for fear of law and order problem. The case was filed in the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma in May 1993 but till 29th February1996, he could not secure the presence of the accused in the court, in spite of innumerable summons/NBWs/warrants he issued. The police stubbornly refused to comply with the orders of the court. At long last, when he ordered the police commissioner Nikhil Kumar to excutethe NBW on the accused, the accused filed the writ petition and secured stay order from the high court. During the pendency of the writ petition the NCT Govt. took the decision to withdraw the case on the ground that the continuance of the case would jeopardize the law and order situation. It is the same ground for which the police did not arrest Ahmed Bukhari although he was accussed of committing an offence u/s 124 I.P.C. When some residents of the area objected against the withdrawal of the case and the Magistrate upheld their objection refusing to give permission to withdraw the case, NCT Govt. filed revision petition against the order of the Magistrate on the same ground of maintenance of public peace and order.In effect, the High Court allowed the appeal and permitted the case to be withdrawn by the NCT Govt. An extra-ordinary and an unprecedented act of the Delhi High Court deserves mention. Justice S.K. Mehra summoned the accused to the High Court and examined him in respect of the allegations against him. The accused, naturally denied the allegations. His denial and assurance for good conduct in future, and the fact that there had been no complaints against the behavior of the accused, subsequent to the incident inquestion, convinced the honourable Judge to the extent that he allowed NCT Govt. to withdraw the case.

Thus the High Court also laid down a precedent. If a person is accused of a theft and it is found that he has not committed another theft subsequent to that incident, the case should be withdrawn against him. The High Court also did not take adverse note of the willful non-compliance of orders of a judicial authority by police for service of summons/warrants/NBWs. against the accused for about two and a half years. In brief, even though offence u/s 124-A IPC is a cognizable offence,police did not arrest the accused and did not serve summons/ warrants/ NBWs on him and NCT Govt. withdrew the case against him for just one reason that he has a following of a mob that may endanger public peace and tranquility. The High Court also found it to be a valid reason to withdraw the case. NCT Govt. neither had the courage nor the will to arrest and proceed against the Ahmed Bukhari. But the case of Shankarcharya is different. Shankarcharya does not have a following of mobs that may endanger public peace and religious amity. So why should Tamil Nadu Govt. worry? It is the lamb that is scarified and not the wolf.
--

JESUIT OATH

JESUIT OATH IN ACTION THROUGH ANTONIA MAINO!!

Last updated May 28, 2004 BY POPE.

URL; http://www.reformation.org/jesuit_oath_in_action.html

According to the Vatican, the U.S. government is an heretical government because it is not based on ROMAN CANON LAW and therefore it is due for destruction according to diabolical oath quoted below:

"When a Jesuit of the minor rank is to be elevated to command, he is conducted into the Chapel of the Convent of the Order, where there are only three others present, the principal or Superior standing in front of the altar. On either side stands a monk, one of whom holds a banner of yellow and white, which are the Papal colors, and the other a black banner with a dagger and red cross above a skull and crossbones, with the word INRI, and below them the words
'IUSTUM, NECAR, REGES, IMPIOUS.'

The meaning of which is: It is just to exterminate or annihilate impious or heretical Kings, Governments, or Rulers.

Upon the floor is a red cross at which the postulant or candidate kneels. The Superior hands him a small black crucifix, which he takes in his left hand and presses to his heart, and the Superior at the same time presents to him a dagger, which he grasps by the blade and holds the point against his heart, the Superior still holding it by the hilt, and thus addresses the postulant:"

Superior speaks:

My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.

CONSTITUTIONAL FRATERNITY OF ANTONIA MAINO

You have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace. To take sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the means.

You have been taught your duty as a spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to be all things to all men, for the Pope's sake, whose servants we are unto death.

You have received all your instructions heretofore as a novice, a neophyte, and have served as co-adjurer, confessor and priest, but you have not yet been invested with all that is necessary to command in the Army of Loyola in the service of the Pope. You must serve the proper time as the instrument and executioner as directed by your superiors; for none can command here who has not consecrated his labors with the blood of the heretic; for "without the shedding of blood no man can be saved." Therefore, to fit yourself for your work and make your own salvation sure, you will, in addition to your former oath of obedience to your order and allegiance to the Pope, repeat after me---

The Extreme Oath of the Jesuits:

"1, _ now, in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the blessed Michael the Archangel, the blessed St. John the Baptist, the holy Apostles St. Peter and St. Paul and all the saints and sacred hosts of heaven, and to you, my ghostly father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola in the Pontificate of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear, that his holiness the Pope is Christ's Vice-regent and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation and that they may safely be destroyed. Therefore, to the utmost of my power I shall and will defend this doctrine of his Holiness' right and custom against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority whatever, especially the Lutheran of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and the now pretended authority and churches of England and Scotland, and branches of the same now established in Ireland and on the Continent of America and elsewhere; and all adherents in regard that they be usurped and heretical, opposing the sacred Mother Church of Rome. I do now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named Protestants or Liberals, or obedience to any of the laws, magistrates or officers.

I do further declare that the doctrine of the churches of England and Scotland, of the Calvinists, Huguenots and others of the name Protestants or Liberals to be damnable and they themselves damned who will not forsake the same.

I do further declare, that I will help, assist, and advise all or any of his Holiness' agents in any place wherever I shall be, in Switzerland, Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, England, Ireland or America, or in any other Kingdom or territory I shall come to, and do my uttermost to extirpate the heretical Protestants or Liberals' doctrines and to destroy all their pretended powers, regal or otherwise.

I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with, to assume my religion heretical, for the propaganda of the Mother Church's interest, to keep secret and private all her agents' counsels from time to time, as they may entrust me and not to divulge, directly or indirectly, by word, writing or circumstance whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father, or any of this sacred covenant.
I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver (perinde ac cadaver), but will unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and of Jesus Christ.

That I may go to any part of the world withersoever I may be sent, to the frozen regions of the North, the burning sands of the desert of Africa, or the jungles of India, to the centers of civilization of Europe, or to the wild haunts of the barbarous savages of America, without murmuring or repining, and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me.

I furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.

In confirmation of which, I hereby dedicate my life, my soul and all my corporal powers, and with this dagger which I now receive, I will subscribe my name written in my own blood, in testimony thereof; and should I prove false or weaken in my determination, may my brethren and fellow soldiers of the Militia of the Pope cut off my hands and my feet, and my throat from ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein, with all the punishment that can be inflicted upon me on earth and my soul be tortured by demons in an eternal hell forever!

All of which, I, _, do swear by the Blessed Trinity and blessed Sacraments, which I am now to receive, to perform and on my part to keep inviolable; and do call all the heavenly and glorious host of heaven to witness the blessed Sacrament of the Eucharist, and witness the same further with my name written and with the point of this dagger dipped in my own blood and sealed in the face of this holy covenant."

(He receives the wafer from the Superior and writes his name with the point of his dagger dipped in his own blood taken from over his heart.)

Superior speaks:

"You will now rise to your feet and I will instruct you in the Catechism necessary to make yourself known to any member of the Society of Jesus belonging to this rank.

In the first place, you, as a Brother Jesuit, will with another mutually make the ordinary sign of the cross as any ordinary Roman Catholic would; then one cross his wrists, the palms of his hands open, and the other in answer crosses his feet, one above the other; the first points with forefinger of the right hand to the center of the palm of the left, the other with the forefinger of the left hand points to the center of the palm of the right; the first then with his right hand makes a circle around his head, touching it; the other then with the forefinger of his left hand touches the left side of his body just below his heart; the first then with his right hand draws it across the throat of the other, and the latter then with a dagger down the stomach and abdomen of the first. The first then says Iustum; and the other answers Necar; the first Reges. The other answers Impious." (The meaning of which has already been explained.) "The first will then present a small piece of paper folded in a peculiar manner, four times, which the other will cut longitudinally and on opening the name Jesu will be found written upon the head and arms of a cross three times. You will then give and receive with him the following questions and answers:

Question —From whither do you come? Answer — The Holy faith.

Q. —Whom do you serve?

A. —The Holy Father at Rome, the Pope, and the Roman Catholic Church Universal throughout the world.

Q. —Who commands you?

A. —The Successor of St. Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Society of Jesus or the Soldiers of Jesus Christ.

Q. —Who received you? A. —A venerable man in white hair.

Q. —How?

A. —With a naked dagger, I kneeling upon the cross beneath the banners of the Pope and of our sacred order.

Q. —Did you take an oath?

A. —I did, to destroy heretics and their governments and rulers, and to spare neither age, sex nor condition. To be as a corpse without any opinion or will of my own, but to implicitly obey my Superiors in all things without hesitation of murmuring.

Q. —Will you do that? A. —I will.

Q. —How do you travel? A. —In the bark of Peter the fisherman.

Q. —Whither do you travel? A. —To the four quarters of the globe.

Q. —For what purpose?

A. —To obey the orders of my general and Superiors and execute the will of the Pope and faithfully fulfill the conditions of my oaths.

Q. —Go ye, then, into all the world and take possession of all lands in the name of the Pope. He who will not accept him as the Vicar of Jesus and his Vice-regent on earth, let him be accursed and exterminated."

This oath is taken from the book Subterranean Rome by Charles Didier, translated from the French and published in New York in 1843.

Warning gruesome scenes of demonic violence!!

Orthodox woman murdered in cowardly NATO attack.
Eleven month old baby girl Bojana Vasovic murdered in NATO attack.
The girl's father killed.
Girl's mother killed.
April 16, 1999.
NATO bombs civilian convoy and kills 85 Albanian Moslems
May 7, 1999
Chinese Embassy is hit killing 4 Chinese including 2 newlyweds
May 14, 1999
NATO bombs Albanians at night killing up to 100 men, women, and children
Extracted by:
Apt
===

The fruits of dreaded democracy

The fruits of dreaded democracy
The nation has an imported super PM Antonia, who is thief of Aamer Fort Treasury. She has been commanded by bastard & ghost Jesus to slay the reader. This is divine command. The command has absolute and unfettered fundamental right of the dreaded predator Indian Constitution vide Article 29(1). The excuse is quite simple. The reader is not ruled by Jesus. One may read this divine command in Bible, Luke, Chapter 19 Verse 27, “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.”
The another puppet of Antonia is 'Pratibha' the President of India. On July 25, 2007, by marrying Bharat Mata, she heralded lesbian marriage in India. She is financial racketeer and is still shielding her brother & husband. She has taken oath to defend the very predator, pirate & killer Indian Constitution.
There is judiciary in dreaded democracy. Judiciary has held Koran & Bible religious books. No court can sit in to judgment against these books. (Chandmal Chopra v State of West Bengal AIR 1986 CALCUTTA 104; 1986 Cr.L.J. 182). Armed with the section 196 of Criminal Procedure Code that restrains citizens, police and judges from taking any action against Azan & Namaz u/s 153 & 295 of the Indian Penal Code, President & Governors are deliberately protecting assassins, robbers and rapists to eradicate Human race as such are culprit punishable u/s 108 of the Indian Penal Code. Police cannot arrest Muslim Imam who shouts Azaan and thus insults Ishwar and Vedic culture. No judge can take cognizance against Azaan, Koran & Bible under the very section 196. No Police can be prosecuted under the section 197.
Tell me, how would you survive? (Koran 9:5; 33:61 etc) & (Bible, Luke 19:27). How would women save their chastity? (Koran 23:6) & (Bible, Isaiah 13:16).
Who would stop Pratibha & Antonia Maino from inflicting doom?
Death & rape of women is hovering on your head. Who would stop Pratibha & Antonia Maino from inflicting doom?
Whether religion? Their religions give them salvation in lieu of our genocide. (Koran 8:39) & (Bible, Luke 19:27).
Whether the society? She has voted Antonia Maino to rule! Now, U.P. has yet another thief of Taj corridor voted as CM.
Whether the police? She is duty bound to protect Antonia Maino, the thief of Aamer Treasury commanded by Jesus to slay those, who do not accept Jesus their king!!
Whether the judge? The judge has taken oath of faith & allegiance to uphold the Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution & law fabricated by Antonia Maino and Congress of Christians!!!
In Democracy, the President & Governors have to take oath to protect and defend the Indian Constitution and laws. The Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution stipulates that the both would help conserve the cultures of Muslims & Christians. We, Aryans, are non-believing people. Commander-in-Chief of army & President Pratibha, a puppet of Antonia has taken oath to defend the dreaded predator and pirate Indian Constitution. She has support of cow & man-eater thief Antonia Maino, another agent of Putanaa culture & Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution. So long as the Indian Constitution, Koran & Bible survives, human race cannot survive. You are left without any forum to even to complain.
The blight of human race is imminent. One has lost one's acumen. Tulsidas writes in Ram Charit Manas, Lanka Kand, 36:7-8, "Kaal Dand gahi kahu n mara. Hara`i Dharm, bal, buddhi vichara. Nikat kal jehi aavat sai`n. tehi bhram ho`i tumharihi nai'n."
Meaning: Death does not kill by a stick. It snatches Dharm, strength, intelect & acumen. He, whose death is near; is confused like you.
Eradication of human race is imminent. Human race has lost wisdom. A Government that extorts taxes over 17% of the produce is extortionist. A religion that snatches freedom of worship cannot be secular. The words, "Public Interest" & "Social Justice" are weapons to usurp the belongings of the haves. The end payers of corporate tax, VAT and even Income tax are poor people. The industrialists and traders are being forced to loot the poor and pass the booty to the dreaded democratic Governments. If one says that the tax is used for the welfare of poor, one is patently wrong. Bofor Chor Rajiv Gandhi, the so-called Mr. clean, had already told the nation in 1985 that 85% money of exchequer was being siphoned off by the intermediaries during his tenure. Now the position has further deteriorated. Look! Poor Jehovah has no share in booty. Poor Allah takes 20% only. (Koran 8:41). However, Pratibha and thief Antonia Maino and their servants gallop 85% of the exchequer as per the admission of the ex PM of this dreaded Democracy!
Right of private defence provided vide Sections 102 & 105 of the Indian Penal Code is being denied by the Presidents & the State Governors, who are armed with Sections 196 & 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Judiciary has held Koran & Bible religious books. No court can sit in to judgment against these books. (Chandmal Chopra v State of West Bengal AIR 1986 CALCUTTA 104; 1986 Cr.L.J. 182). Armed with the section 196 of Criminal Procedure Code that restrains citizens, police and judges from taking any action against Azan & Namaz u/s 153 & 295 of the Indian Penal Code, President & Governors are deliberately protecting assassins, robbers and rapists to eradicate Human race as such are culprits punishable u/s 108 of the Indian Penal Code. Police THAT cannot arrest Muslim Imam, who shouts Azaan and thus insults Ishwar and Vedic culture, are deputed to protect Muslims, who abuse non-Muslim faiths & incite communal violence, . No judge can take cognizance against Azaan, Koran & Bible under the very section 196. No Police can be prosecuted under the section 197.
While Muslims & Christians are armed with draconian Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution to eradicate Vedic culture, President Pratibha, Governors, & District Magistrates have been armed with sections 196 & 197 to protect Muslims & Christians with incentive to usurp the belongings of the haves under Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution.
The fundamental Right to Property provided vide Article 31 of the Indian Constitution could not be snatched even by the Britons and the Constitution Committee. This Article 31 was amended by the dacoit Parliamentarians and upheld by the apex Court. Now the Article has been omitted from the Constitution since 20.06.1979.
The Media, the fourth pillar of dreaded predator & pirate Democracy never told you these facts since 1947. Does the reader know why?
Mr. John Swinton on “FREEDOM OF PRESS”
“A couple of centuries back, Press was supposed to be the FOURTH pillar of the State, the other three pillars being; Legislature, Executives and the Judiciary.
"The honesty and integrity of the Press have been on the decline. Finally,
Mr. John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff of the New York Times addressing the New York Press club admitted in 1953, as follows:
“There is no such thing as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you, who dare to write your honest opinion. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with.
“Any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job… The business of the journalist is to destroy truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; … We are tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes… WE ARE INTELLECTUAL PROSTITUTES”. Let us not lament at the dishonesty we see in our Indian press, in fact, in reporting on India in the foreign press as well. In India, everything is cheaper than in Europe and USA, including the Press Prostitutes.”

No stone has been left untouched to eradicate Vedic culture & Aryans.
Duty of judiciary, President of India & Governors
As long as Muslims & Christians slay Aryans, nicknamed as Hindus, usurp Aryans properties, kidnap Aryans women & rape them, shout Azaan on loud speakers, demolish Aryans' worship places, assassinate Soldiers, demand Kashmir & Nagaland, Muslims & Christians get peace prizes. In lieu of abusing you, your faith, your Ishwar & your culture & inciting communal hatred and ill will, while judges cannot even take cognizance of the offence committed by Muslim Imams, for want of sanction under section 196 CrPC, the Indian government gives Rs 1,000 crores (Rs 10 billion) towards salaries to imams of mosques and Rs 200 crores (Rs 2 billion) as Haj subsidies. But no such help is available to Brahmin priests & pilgrims. Look! Not only the Brahmins, but all other castes & creeds are suffering in silence today, seeing the minorities abusing the majority under Government aid & abetment. Section 196 of the CrPC is being used by Governors as arm to protect Muslims & Christians to liquidate Vedic culture & eliminate Aryans.
1. Governments protect Muslims' & Christians' crimes committed under sections 153 & 295 IPC. No court can take cognizance for the crimes committed by Muslims & Christians, no police can register FIR against Muslims & Christians & no one can complain without sanction u/s 196 of CrPC. No sooner, their Koran, Bible & the predator Indian Constitution is quoted, the Governments get horrified. Sanction u/s 196 is immediately granted. In the impugned case, it is not that the quotations are not in Bible & Koran, but my crime is exposing the danger these books have posed upon humanity & conspiracy of Governments to eradicate Vedic culture.
2. I am telling these things, because I know that my days are numbered. I am already of 73 years. It makes me happy if I die at once instead of facing death at every moment.
3. But you judges are digging your own graves in lust of booty and sex. What would you people give in legacy to your descendents?
The vast preponderance of ignorant Christians & Muslims do not know their prophet or their religion. They lead a life of ignorance, despair, tyranny, and mind-numbing rituals. They are kept in the dark, purposely deceived, for the benefit of clerics and kings. There is no incentive for Muslims & Christians to learn. Even if exposed to the truth, they would not reject Islam (Koran 4:89) or Jesus (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11) for fear of their lives. The Koran & Bible themselves confirm this startling reality. (5:101 & 102). Allah commanded Muslims “not to question the Koran,” for those who did, he said, “discarded their religion.”
In that light, Aryavrt wishes freeing Muslim & Christian women from the oppressiveness of Islam & Christianity. For by freeing them - we will free ourselves from the scourge of their terror.
Islam & Christianity has nothing to do with peace, love or salvation. Both have no alibi and no reason to cry for their unfair deeds. While Koran condemns equally all non-Muslims, Christians and Jews as well as those, who worship any god save Allah, Bible of Christianity condemns all non-Christians. Islam & Christianity are equal opportunity haters and warmongers. Their attitudes toward aliens are overwhelmingly hostile. For relatively few nice verses, relatively more verses contradict, replace, and “abrogate” these verses. You have come with excuse of parables. When opportunity comes these parables become commands.
In fact, the Koran & Bible were written to justify some of the most ungodly & immoral behaviors the world has ever known.
The simple truth is: good Muslims & Christians are bad people. Islam & Christianity converts them that way. While there are plenty of “bad” Muslims & Christians, who are good people, they are as impotent as bad Nazis of Germany during Hitler’s era or bad Communists during Stalin’s era. The Koran & Bible defines good and bad Muslims & Christian for us.
Allah's good Muslim is a Jihadist i.e. crusader of Islam, a man who leaves his home, sacrificing his wealth and life, fighting in Allah’s Cause. (Koran, 8:72). That cause is destroying all faiths save Islam. (Koran 8:39). Look! This is secularism. Allah says they will be rewarded with stolen booty (Koran, 8:1 & 41) & women to rape (Koran, 23:6) of the victim/s, if they survive or with a heavenly BROTHEL (Koran, 37:47-49 & 76:19-21) if they die. Bad Muslims, on the other hand, are peaceful. Allah calls them “hypocrites” because they are unwilling to fight. (Koran, 3:167). He even says that peaceful Muslims are “the vilest of creatures” and that hell’s hottest fires await them. If you are a peace-loving Muslim, may note, your Allah hates you. You Muslims have no shame that you submit to dreaded incest monger, (Koran 31:37-38) assassin & robber Allah. (Koran, 8:1 & 17)
Good Muslims are those, who read Islam’s scriptures the guide of criminals named secular Koran & secular Hadith, planned, funded, staffed, executed, and celebrated the terrorist attacks of 9th September, 2001 upon World Trade Centre. They proudly told the world about their plan — terrorize the human beings into submission. (Koran, 8:12 & 13) Muslims boldly proclaimed why they were going to do it—for the eradication of non-Islamic faiths. (Koran, 8:39) Muslims even told us who good Muslims were? But, Kafir non-Muslims ignored their announcements.
Similarly, Jesus is a ghost fabricated by Christian rulers to rule upon the world. In Bible, Jesus himself commands his sheep, “But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them bring them here and kill them in front of me.” Bible, Luke 19:27. Jesus further says in Bible, "Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword." (Bible, Matt 10:34). & that he has come on the earth to bring fire. (Bible, Luke 12:49).
One, who deposes faith in Christianity, may note that one loses manhood to become sheep no sooner one accepts Jesus one's saviour. The father of Jesus named Yahweh/Jehovah is scared of wisdom in man. (Bible, Genesis 2:17). This is because Yahweh is Satan. A man with wisdom would understand that these acts of murder, plunder & rape are crimes & sins both and would not succumb as such the first condition of Judaism is that one must not have wisdom and must be ready to slay & rob non Jews & rape their women. Yahweh is brainchild of Moses. Moses invented Yahweh/Jehovah to enslave the humanity & steel the possessions of the humanity. In lieu of accepting servility of Moses, the followers of Yahweh/Jehovah have been granted three incentives by Moses, on behalf of imposter Jehovah, to conquer the world for the prosperity & propagation of his faith Judaism viz. (1) His followers would ravish women of their choice in front of the eyes of the men of victim women; (Bible, Isaiah 13:16), (2) would usurp the properties of victim & slay the conquered men (Bible Deut. 20:14) and (3) would demolish their worship places. (Bible Deut. 12:1-3) Moses died and left his dogmas behind towards legacy for Jews. Jews became victims and are still victims of their own dogmas invented by Moses and a new prophet Jesus was invented to rule upon the world of sheep, who willingly relinquished manhood in lieu of booty & sex. The quality of sheep is that it follows without applying mind. If first sheep would fall, all would fall in well. Ultimately last prophet Muhammad was born. He was illiterate. Satan Allah could not create a better messenger.
Aryavrt has revealed the information. You may decide the fate of humanity. Islamic & Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving us. The truth isn’t hidden, nor is it hard to find. Media is scared, clueless, & willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. Good Muslims will continue to wage Jihad until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means is petro dollars & motivation is Koran. (Koran 8:39) If we don’t, they will kill Human race.
Like Nazis rolling into Poland following the “peace process” in 1930s Europe, the perpetrators of Islamic terror are inflamed by a violent and racist doctrine. The doctrine is ' Fight them until persecution is no more and the Religion of Allah reigns supreme.' (Koran 8:39). They too have an agenda, and we are ignorant of it. If we do not retaliate, humanity would finish.
Thus, Christianity corrupts her followers. Sir Edmund Burke put it this way: "All that is necessary for the forces of evil to win in this world is for a few good men to do nothing."
While the Christianity & Islam have stipulated the condition for existence of humanity of being slave of either Jesus or Allah by deceit, Aryans' (who are branded invaders) Vedic culture forbids deceit. Its scriptures do not allow ambush & terrorism. Aryans did propagate their Buddhism around the world, but nowhere had they ruled upon aliens’ territories. They did not demolish worship places and idols of aliens. They did not kill male persons and infants and did not rape women of alien faith. Their scriptures did not permit such crimes. Look! What Jews, Christians and Muslims did around the world! Jesus is fraud & enemy of Christians as well as Allah is fraud & enemy of Muslims. Vedic Panth has no compulsion. Gita 7:21. If one wishes to survive as well as protect human race, may switch to Vedic Panth.
Is Islam peaceful religion?
Those who support the politically inspired notion that terrorism is not condoned by Islam and that terrorists have corrupted an otherwise peaceful religion, consider the quotations below:-
Peace is taboo in Islam. Those Muslims who did not adopt crusade (Jihad) and observed peace have been consigned by Allah to their grave hell, since the inception of Islam. They would bear the punishment till Qayamat i.e the Day of Judgment. However, those who plundered, murdered, raped women of non-Muslims, became Ghazi if survived and secured instant supreme heaven (Firdaus) if slain. Allah is fraud. Allah promises heaven but consigns Muslims in hell till The Day of Judgment. Allah's good Muslim is a Jihadist i.e. crusader of Islam, a man who leaves his home, sacrificing his wealth and life, fighting in Allah’s Cause. Allah says they will be rewarded with stolen booty if they survive or with a heavenly BROTHEL if they die. Bad Muslims, on the other hand, are peaceful. Allah calls them “hypocrites” because they are unwilling to fight. He even says that peaceful Muslims are “the vilest of creatures” and that hell’s hottest fires await them. If you are a peace-loving Muslim, may note, your Allah hates you.
Good Muslims are those, who read Islam’s scriptures, the guide of criminals named Koran, planned, funded, staffed, executed, and celebrated the terrorist attacks of 9th September, 2001 upon World Trade Centre. They proudly told the world about their plan — terrorize the human beings into submission. Muslims boldly proclaimed why they were going to do it—for the advancement of Islam. Muslims even told us who they were—good Muslims. But, we non-Muslims ignored their announcements.
apostle of non violence.
The vast preponderance of ignorant Christians & Muslims do not know their prophet or their religion. They lead a life of ignorance, despair, tyranny, and mind-numbing rituals. They are kept in the dark, purposely deceived, for the benefit of clerics and kings. There is no incentive for Muslims & Christians to learn. Even if exposed to the truth, they would not reject Islam (Koran 4:89) or Jesus (Bible, Deut. 13:6-11) for fear of their lives. The Koran & Bible themselves confirm this startling reality. (5:101 & 102). Allah commanded Muslims “not to question the Koran,” for those who did, he said, “discarded their religion.”

Ahimsa revisited

From: Aryavrt Government
77, Khera Khurd, Delhi-110082 (INDIA)
Phone: +91 9868324025/ 9451563118 Email: aryavrt@gmail.com
Letter No. 07927y Dated; Thursday, September 27, 2007

If Jihad is bad, how Mission is good?
Antonia is Jesuit and Aamer Fort treasury thief.

Ahimsa revisited

To,
Shri Anil Bhanot,
i. Stop this hue and cry for AHIMSA. It is being used by media to divert our attention from the imminent danger that Democracy and its dreaded predator and pirate Indian Constitution has posed.
ii. We must think of the survival of human race. So long as the Indian Constitution, Koran & Bible survive, human races cannot survive.

iii. While Muslims and Christians have unfettered fundamental right, (Koran 8:17) and (Bible, Luke 19:27) reinforced by Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution, to slay aliens, Aryans are compelled to observe Ahimsa!

Violence is the precondition of existence of a creature

iv. Let me make it clear that violence is the precondition of existence of a creature. It starts even before the birth in the womb of mother. The same violence protracts until the death of a creature. Do you know how?

v. While millions of sperms are injected in womb only one survives, rest die. That culminates in birth of a creature. The violence does not stop there. The blood of every creature consists of red and white molecules. While red molecules circulate oxygen in the body, white molecules kill enemy bacteria. If you are in doubt, consult any zoologist or doctor.

vi. We have a Manusmriti. It defines Dharm. Out of 10 ingradients of Dharm none is Ahimsa. Ahimsa is the root cause of Aryans servility and doom. Ahimsa was adopted by Buddh and Jain and now by imposter MK Gandhi.

Dhritih kshamaa damo’steyam
Showcham indriya-nigrahah
Dheer vidyaa satyam akrodho
Dashakam dharma lakshanam. Manusmriti

1. Dhriti - steadfastness

2. Kshamaa - forgiveness

3. Dama - subduing passions

4. Asteya - non-stealing

5. Showcha - purity

6. Indriya Nigraha - control of the senses

7. Dhee – concentration

8. Vidyaa - knowledge

9. Satya - truth

10. Akrodha - absence of anger


vii. Enemy must be eliminated else enemy would eliminate you. To stop an evil kings establish police and judges. Both do not kill every citizen, who is uncivilized. Again there is Shloka in Manusmriti.

"Dandah shasti praja sarva dand abhirakshati.
Dandah supteshu jagrti, dandam dharmam vidurbudhah"

Meaning: Punishment rules upon the citizens. Punishment protects citizens. When the whole world sleeps, the punishment wakes. Therefore, learned people say punishment Dharm.

viii. Evil must stop. Dand is the only way. You can stop 'Dand' on the cost of anarchy and eradication of human race.

ix. The Indian Constitution has branded us criminal Kafirs and Satans. Judaism, Islam & Christianity are religions fabricated by their prophets establishing themselves as intermediaries to God. Today’s media, pseudo-secular humanists and sooth-sayers are misguiding humanity. This is lethal. The errant blending of crime with religion and calling fabricated religions peaceful, the reshaping of jihad & mission into spiritual struggles, and providing the impression that Islam and Christianity are tolerant, seculars and that the terrorists & missionaries are corrupting their religions, is fatal. Thousands are being killed in the wake of their illusions.

x. We are non-believing people. Secular President Pratibha has been voted by dacoit Legislative members to defend Secular Allah to slay us, rape our women & convert us to Islam & our Bharat in to Dar-Ul-Islam. She is puppet of cow & man-eater Jesuit thief Antonia Maino & Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution.

xi. Allah commands, “Fight until persecution, which is worse than slaughter, (Koran, 2:191) is no more and religion is all for Allah.” (Koran 8:39) Thus, Islam is a religion of the sword with the blade forever at the throat of every unbeliever. Allah is fraud. Allah has been invented to enslave one & steal ones possessions. Allah promises heaven but consigns Muslims in hell till The Day of Judgment.

xii. The legion of commentators portray Christianity & Islam as religions of peace, hijacked by Muslim Mujahids and Christian Missionaries. A close study shows the same a sheer nonsense. This nonsense, however, leads gullible men think that the Jihadi attacks upon you and your community are merely Islamic reactions against Governments' policy in India and in the Middle East in general, and to its allegedly pro-Hindu stance vis-a-vis the Kashmeres in particular. Similarly, the commentators' view that Missionaries conversion is freedom of faith is fatal. These apologetic views of Islam and Christianity are actually fatal for human race.

xiii. As long as the Indian Constitution, Koran and Bible and their dogmas are honoured in Bharat, we, Hindus, cannot survive. We, Hindus, are Kafirs and Satans. Now, we have secular Financial racketeer Pratibha President, who has taken oath to help Christians and Muslims conserve their cultures commanded by Jesus and Allah to slay us. Our crime? We are idolators.(Koran 9:5). We have another imported and planted secular cow and man eater thief of Aamer Fort treasury Antonia Maino as super PM, who has been commanded by Jesus to slay us. Our crime? We do not accept Jesus our king. (Bible, Luke 19:27). We have a notorious predator and pirate Indian Constitution, the Article 29(1) of which has already granted unfettered fundamental right to both killers named Pratibha and Antonia Maino, to help conserve their cultures of genocide, plunder and rape of women i.e. to slay us to secure their seat in heaven.

xiv. Christians and Muslims have divine commands as well as unfettered fundamental right vides Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution to slay Aryans. No one has right to slay Aryans. Aryans have legal right of private defence vides sections 102 and 105 of the Indian Penal Code. Although Article 31 of the Indian Constitution has been amended and now is omitted from the Indian Constitution since 20-6-1979, there is no amendment in the above sections. Citizens have legal right to take back fundamental right to property and save their lives.
xv. Rise to the occassion. If one wishes to survive, one has no option than helping Aryavrt Government arrest Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi to salvage Bharat and Vedic culture. Therefore, join Vedic Panth and support Aryavrt Government, else get ready for doom.
xvi. Aryavrt Government is alone that is opposing both dreaded cultures and regimens of Christianity and Islam. This is a big task and we need huge funds for protection of human races.

Evidences

Peace is taboo in Islam and Christianity

Peace is taboo in Islam. (Koran 2:216). Allah commands, “Fight until persecution, which is worse than slaughter, (Koran, 2:191) is no more and religion is all for Allah.” (Koran 8:39) Those Muslims who did not adopt crusade (Jihad) and observed peace have been consigned by Allah to their grave hell, since the inception of Islam. They would bear the punishment till Qayamat i.e the Day of Judgment. However, those who plundered, murdered, raped women of non-Muslims, became Ghazi if survived and secured instant supreme heaven (Firdaus) if slain. Allah is fraud. Allah promises heaven but consigns Muslims in hell until The Day of Judgment.

Now about Jesus

Extracted from Bible new testament- Matthew 10:34-36
34. Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.
35 For I have come to turn, a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.
36. A man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.
Extracted from Bible John/ Chapter 6 / Verse 53
Jesus said to them, “I am telling you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood; you have no life in you."
Extracted from Bible-Luke/ Chapter 12 / Verse 49-53.
"49. I have come to bring fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled”
"50. But I have a baptism to undergo, and how distressed I am until it is completed!"
"51. Do you think I came to bring peace on earth? No, I tell you, but division.”
“52. From now on there will be five in one family divided against each other, three against two and two agaisnt three."
“ 53. They will be divided, father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law."
Extracted from Bible-Luke/ Chapter 22 Verses 36-38
“36. He said to them, But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”
“38. The disciples said, “ See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That is enough. He replied.”
However, Christians cannot admit the above facts.

http://www.reformation.org/jesuit_oath_in_action.html
Jesuit Sonia has promised as under,
I (Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi) furthermore promise and declare that I will, when opportunity present, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do, to extirpate and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth; and that I will spare neither age, sex or condition; and that I will hang, waste, boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics, rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads against the walls, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race. That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the poisoned cup, the strangulating cord, the steel of the poniard or the leaden bullet, regardless of the honor, rank, dignity, or authority of the person or persons, whatever may be their condition in life, either public or private, as I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or Superior of the Brotherhood of the Holy Faith, of the Society of Jesus.
Leaders, reformers, saints, Media, Islamic and Missionary politicos and clerics are purposely deceiving humanity. The truth is not hidden, nor is it hard to find. Media is scared, clueless, and willfully ignorant at the cost of human eradication. Good Muslims and Christians would continue to wage Jihad and Mission until we stop them by eliminating their means and motivation. Means is petro dollars and Missionary funds and motivation is Koran and Bible. (Koran 8:39) and (Bible, Luke 19:27). If we do not retaliate, they would keep on killing Human races.
No one is safe (Bible, Luke 19:27) and (Koran 8:39; 9:5; 33:61 etc) in Democracy. No worship place and culture can survive. [ (Bible Deut. 12:1-3) and (Koran, Bani Israel, 17:81)] No one can retain property [Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution and omitted Article 31] and chastity of no woman is safe under the dogmas of the Indian Constitution, [Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution] Koran (Koran 23:6) and Bible (Bible, Isaiah 13:16).
Even election is not for the rescue of citizens, because no voter can change either Article 29(1) or 39(c) or claim restoration of Article 31 of the Indian Constitution. Thus, one votes to decide as to who would plunder the subjects, whether Atal or Mulayam or Chandrashekhar or Antonia Maino alias Sonia Gandhi or Mayavati? Citizens vote to agree as to under whose regimen one's properties would be usurped, one's women would be raped and one would be slain!
Antonia Maino is thief of Aamer Fort treasury robbed by Indira and Sanjay Gandhi during emergency. The Aamer Fort booty has taken three lives of Sanjay, Indira and Rajiv Gandhis. George W Bush knows and is black-mailing Antonia Maino. The black-mailing has culminated in Atomic treaty. Now, India cannot have atomic weapons, while China as well as Pakistan would keep on having atomic weapons and right of atomic tests. Can Antonia Maino, who is said to have sacrificed her posts for nation, now, return the booty to Bharat?
The Aamer Fort Treasury belongs to the people of Bharat. This is because it was robbed by the army chief of Mogul king Akbar named Man Singh from the kings of Bharat after defeating them. It was concealed in Fort Vaults before the robbery of Sanjay and Indira. Even Britons could not touch the Treasury. Aryavrt Government seeks support of media and people of Bharat to repatriate the booty. Without arrest of Antonia Maino it would not be possible. People are suggested to support Aryavrt Government if they wish to survive with dignity. Media must bring the truth before people in her own interest.
Even Antonia Maino won't survive. Once Antonia Maino and her family members are removed, the treasury would become property of the bank, where it is deposited. It would be a great loss for the nation. The treasury is worth of trillions of trillion Dollars.

Human races cannot survive

So long as the Indian Constitution, Koran and Bible survive, human race cannot survive.
This is because if raping women of alien faith is free from blame (Koran 23:6) for Muslims, then how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded to ravish the women of non-Christians before the eyes of the men of the victim women (Bible, Isaiah 13:16)? If those worshipping other Gods save Allah be killed is justified, (Koran 2:191) how can Muslims refute Christians, who have been commanded by Jesus to slay those who do not accept Jesus their king? (Bible, Luke 19:27). If snatching the belongings of other person is offence, why the democrats and P.O.s of judiciary, who snatched citizens’ fundamental right to property, (Article 31 - now stands omitted since 20-06-1979) are not dacoits? If property belongs to society, why such society is not usurper? Where is the moral in that society that is owner of the belongings of the haves? Why should we tolerate that Indian Constitution that grants unfettered fundamental right to minorities to slay, rob and rape women of the people of alien faiths? [Article 29(1)]. Governments are duty bound to protect the properties of their citizens. Where is the moral in Article 39(c) of the Indian Constitution that snatches properties of the citizens?

One, who bears the crime is bigger criminal than who inflicts crime. Thus, Aryans are worst criminals in the universe. Christians are the first victims of their faiths. They are paying price for deposing faith in bastard ghost Jesus. Both Christians and Muslims are criminals and their religions are bigger criminals.

Death, destruction and doom is lurking upon human races. Join Vedic Panth, if one wishes to survive.

xvi. The central weakness of Judaism, Christianity & Islam as moral philosophies lie in their eradication of the individual conscience of humanity in favor of unthinking submission to the mere letter of revealed law. The Bible, Koran and Sunnah (example of Mohammed) stand above reason, conscience, or nature. A thing is right - including acts and laws abhorrent to "superseded" or "irrelevant" natural morality - simply because Jehovah, Jesus and Allah say so, or because the prophets have thus said or done. The lack of any pretense to a moral basis for Bible or Sharia (Islamic law) is open and explicit: there is no "spirit of the law" in Christianity and Islam, no rationality behind it for human reason to discover by exercising man's God- given intellect. There is no discernment of the consequences of deeds, and revelation and traditions must not be questioned. Nor may any other standard of good and evil - least of all any notion of "natural" justice such as that assumed by the founding documents of the our Veds or Manusmriti - be invoked.

xvii. Bible and Sharia cannot be penetrated by reason (its apparent inconsistencies notwithstanding) and the very attempt is forbidden heresy. Every Christian or Moslem, who is qualified to give a sound opinion on matters of Bible or Sharia, is entitled to interpret the application of Sharia when such interpretation becomes necessary, but where an explicit command of Jehovah, Jesus and Allah or Prophets already exists, no Pope, Father, Gideon, Cleric or Moslem leader or legislature can form an independent judgment. Since Muhammad is the final prophet, there can be no further development in any judicial matters where the Bible, Koran and Sunnah provide guidance. This deeply undermines the possibility of rational civic debate in Moslem nations and accounts for the distinctly inhuman flavor of their legal systems.
xviii. One may salvage humanity.
xix. Therefore, save human race first. Even if you want to get some thing concrete - ask as to who would initiate enquiry against Antonia Maino, who is in possession of Aamer Fort treasury?
xx. That Democracy is a league of elite class that is ever ready to suicide for sustenance, power & pelf. Its so-called servants have no shame that their employer Pratibha is ordained to get them slain and eradicate their Vedic culture & their super PM is a thief of Aamer Fort treasury imported by Democracy to get them slain, eat their flesh & drink their blood. Article 29(1) of the Indian Constitution read with (Bible, Luke 19:27) and (Bible, John 6:53).

xxi. You have no choice. You are given an Indian Constitution to ensure your Genocide & eradication of Vedic culture. ARYAVRT wishes to get you rid of it.

Yours etc,
Ayodhya Prasad Tripathi, (Press Secretary)

Aryavrt Government

77 Khera Khurd, Delhi - 110 082

Phone: (+91) 9868324025/9451563118 Email: aryavrt39@rediffmail.com